Listen Live
    A pro-Brexit supporter (R) from Invoke Article 50 Now!, dressed as a judge, stands in front of Pro-European Union (EU) supporters outside the entrance to The Royal Courts of Justice, Britain's High Court, in London on October 13, 2016, during a protest against the UK's decision to leave the EU.

    British Court Crushes Attempt to Prosecute Boris Johnson Over Brexit Bus Claim - Report

    © AFP 2019 / Adrian Dennis
    Get short URL

    Boris Johnson has received significant criticism since the 2016 EU referendum from various remain bodies for his '350 million a week to the NHS' claim following a vote to leave. One of which was a crowdfunded private prosecution was launched in February to bring Johnson to court to face charges for misconduct.

    A campaigner who had been pushing for the prosecution of Prime Minister Boris Johnson for allegedly lying during the 2016 EU membership referendum has had his bid to take the case to the Supreme Court blocked on Wednesday, as reported by Sky News.

    29-year old lawyer Marcus Ball has put together a crowdfunded prosecution against the PM for misconduct in public office regarding the '350 million pounds ($445 million) a week to the NHS' claim emblazoned on the side of a large red bus which he drove around UK streets.

    A magistrate had previously agreed in May that the newly crowned prime minister should be summoned to court to face the charges regarding false claims.

    That decision was overruled by London's High Court however the following month.

    The judges decided instead to back the argument made by Boris Johnson's lawyer, that the magistrate's original decision was flawed.

    According to the full ruling published by the High Court Judges in July,  the “problem of false statements in the course of political campaigning is not new.”

    The attempt to turn the case over to the Supreme Court was turned down by Lady Justice Rafferty, who said:

    “This application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court is rejected."

    Both Lady Justice Rafferty and Mr Justice Supperstone explained that there was no legal basis for prosecuting 'false' arguments and they would not amount to neglect of duties or the abuse of state power.

    “There is no precedent for any office holder being prosecuted for misconduct in public office for wilfully making or endorsing a misleading statement in and for the purposes of political campaigning.” as reported in the ruling.

    Johnson's lawyer went on to accuse the process of being "politically motivated."

    The judges mirrored this accusation by confirmed that Mr Ball had removed declarations on his social media history where he discussed legal routes to “prevent Brexit”, as well as openly labeling himself “pro-Remain”.

    Mr Ball has rallied his legal team to consider options such as making a direct appeal to the Supreme Court or even bringing it to the European courts.

    “This isn't over, we are not giving up,” he declared.

    “We are pursuing it, absolutely."

    The case began in February after Mr Ball accused Vote Leave and Mr Johnson of "misleading the public.

    The crowdfund has since received £394,873 with over 10,800 pledged supporters. It was put together on the basis that Ball and his team of researchers believed that "a criminal case" could be brought against Boris Johnson.

    Boris Johnson (the then Mayor of London) rides on the back of a prototype new design London double-decker bus in 2011
    © AP Photo / Matt Dunham
    Boris Johnson on a new Routemaster bus





    Boris Johnson to Fund £250m Artificial Intelligence 'NHS X' Lab Amid No-Deal Brexit Campaign
    Brexit: Boris Johnson Slams 'Terrible Collaboration' Between EU and Remainers
    Nigel Farage Warns not to Trust Boris Johnson's Brexit Pledges
    'No Second Chances': Boris Johnson Pledges to Make UK 'Match Fit' For Brexit
    Supreme Court, Brexit, Boris Johnson
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik