23:55 GMT +322 July 2019
Listen Live
    UK military

    'Oh, Oh You're NOT in the Army Now': Thousands Rejected by UK Forces Due to Acne

    CC0 / Pixabay
    Europe
    Get short URL
    5144

    It turns out that for many UK Armed Forces applicants, an allergic rash, or teenage spots stand in the way of obtaining a much-coveted military contract; but some potential army newbies seem to be determined to face down the unjust contractors, who deem even minor health issues to be incompatible with army service.

    Over 14,000 British Army applicants are said to have been declined for having acne and minor food allergies over the course of the last couple of years, in line with strict Ministry of Defence rules, The Times reported.  The large-scale rejection has in the meantime prompted multiple accusations that the ministry’s recruiting agency, Capita, which is in charge of conducting medicals for armed forces applicants, is gravely misinterpreting the ministry’s health regulations.

    It might be viewed as an indicator that the army is significantly overstaffed, with medical regulations treating even minor ailments that an applicant suffers from to be sufficient reason to deem their application to be a no-go. However, this is by far not the case, since the force is still 5,000 soldiers short of its 82,000 recruitment target, with the army struggling to enlist soldiers, according to the British edition.

    Apart from a pervasive debate on the issue, the “unfair” approach has even prompted one staffer, a lady who used to assess recruits, to quit the job as she had to “turn down too many”. “It was wrong”, The Times quoted her as saying.

    To illustrate her choice to counter the system, she brought up an example of a 16-year-old who was rejected as it emerged that he had previously been given an inhaler, which he appeared to have not used once in his lifetime.

    READ MORE: India is Fighting Against Terrorists, Not Pakistani Citizens or Army — Journo

    Guidelines from the MoD’s medical standards notably revolve around whether or not the applicant is “physically and mentally fit enough to train, serve and fight anywhere in the world”.

    The backlash hasn’t stopped at that, however, with a special campaign, dubbed the Right to Fight, having now been launched for the ministry to revise the rules. The enthusiast behind it is 28-year-old Eddie, who was turned down by the force due to a nut allergy, despite claiming that he had never suffered a single reaction after eating meals in his life.

    British politicians were also quick to weigh in, with former Armed Forces Minister and a Member of the Commons Defence Select Committee Mark Francois noting that although the medical standards should by no means be lowered to secure a more active enrolment, the already existing norms should be interpreted by contractors “more intelligently”.


    Related:

    Army as Lifestyle: Russian Army Uniform Fashion Awards
    Heavy Firing Heard Near Indian Army Camp in Jammu Kashmir
    US Arming 'Liberation Army' in Colombia to Invade Venezuela – Envoy to UN
    India is Fighting Against Terrorists, Not Pakistani Citizens or Army – Journo
    Tags:
    armed forces, applicants, health, check-ups, military contractors, army, United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik