16:41 GMT +322 July 2019
Listen Live
    GCHQ Building at Cheltenham, Gloucestershire is on of the intelligence agencies using old laws to spy on people.

    UK Expansive Overseas Surveillance Bill Puts Journalists at Risk - Watchdogs

    CC BY 2.0 / Defence Images / GCHQ Building at Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
    Europe
    Get short URL
    0 05

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) - A new crime bill being debated in British parliament provides authorities in the UK and overseas unprecedented powers to access data and poses a threat to press freedom, eight watchdog groups said in a letter on Wednesday.

    The letter was signed by Reporters Without Borders, Index on Censorship, English PEN, Big Brother Watch, Open Rights Group, the National Union of Students, Committee on the Administration of Justice and Cage.

    "The bill will enable the [UK] Government to enter treaties to allow foreign governments to make inbound applications for information", the letter said. "This may well result in overseas authorities… having greater powers over UK-held data."

    Many of the expansive powers outlined in the UK’s "Overseas Production Orders" bill are unprecedented and may put journalists' data at risk, the letter added.

    The bill establishes a route for UK authorities to quickly access data on overseas servers including telecom company platforms, and vice versa, the letter said.

    "But that route also takes a shortcut through important protections for citizens’ privacy, which results in a draconian new regime," the letter stated.

    READ MORE: Browse Much? 3,000 Britons Under Surveillance — Ex-UK Counter-Terrorism Officer

    For Britons, under UK common law there is no right of privacy. The House of Lords ruled in October 2003 that there is no general common law tort for invasion of privacy and that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) does not require Britain to adopt one.

    In 2016, Britain adopted a controversial Investigatory Powers Bill, dubbed as the "snooper's charter". The legislation enables the UK security services and police to hack into phones and computers as well as gives police a new power to view call and web records of journalists. Moreover, the law also obliges web and phone companies to store web browsing histories of people for 12 months and provide the police and security services with extraordinary access to the private data.

    In 2018, the UK adopted a new security doctrine, also commonly known as a "Fusion Doctrine". The document envisages the deployment of the full set of national security, economic and influence capabilities in pursuit of national security goals.

    READ MORE: UK Refuses to Cooperate on Belgacom Surveillance Case With Belgium — Reports

    "Our ability to use data, at scale and pace, across organisational boundaries is a critical capability. Data comes in many different forms – public and private, covert and overt, and created by industry and government. The UK has a strong legal framework for data protection, which provides confidence to the public and international partners about our use of data. We are increasing the knowledge and skills base of policy makers, operational partners and strategists to ensure they are data-literate and able to be intelligent customers of analytical insight. We are also investing in recruiting, training and retaining specialist data scientists, systems architects and data analysts", "Fusion Doctrine" says.

    Last September, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK government had breached the right to privacy with its mass electronic surveillance program, which was exposed by former US National Security Agency (NSA) Edward Snowden. The court assessed three aspects of digital surveillance, including the interception of communications, intelligence sharing and acquisition of communications data.

    READ MORE: UK Could Face Legal Action Over Exports of Surveillance Tech — NGO

    In particular, Snowden has revealed that the UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) was running an operation called "Tempora" that allowed it to tap into and store large volumes of data, including phone calls, messages and internet communication.

    For instance, a document released in 2013 by Snowden revealed that the GCHQ orchestrated a cyberattack against Belgium's largest telecommunications company Proximus Group, formerly known as Belgacom Group, in an operation dubbed "Socialist" in August of the same year. According to the leaked documents, the cyberattack enabled the GCHQ to gain unauthorized access to the telecommunication company's customers personal data.

    However, following the revelations, the UK refused to work with the Belgian Federal Prosecutor’s Office on the case, stressing its unwillingness to cooperate with the investigation by alleged threats to Britain's sovereignty and security, The Guardian reported in October 2018.

    READ MORE: Snowden's Lawyer Opens Up About Whistleblower's Life in Russia

    The Belgacom's case sparked a backlash among the world's most renowned watchdogs and non-governmental monitors that have reportedly slammed the incident as a grave violation of human rights, freedom of information and privacy.

    Related:

    GCHQ Staff Suggest Best Way to Beat Encryption is to Add Spies to Private Chats
    Big Win: Britain's GCHQ Spygrid Violates Right to Privacy, ECHR Rules
    Man Killed in Suspected 'Hit and Run' Attack Near Cheltenham GCHQ Spy Agency
    UK Foreign Secretaries Illicitly Allowed GCHQ to Gather Consumer Data - Watchdog
    Blacklisting 101: Ex-Carillion Workers on GCHQ Contract Sue Over Redundancy Pay
    Tags:
    risks, authorities, journalists, surveillance, privacy, UK Government, Reporters Without Borders (RSF), United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik