10:06 GMT +324 April 2018
Listen Live
    A selection of British national newspapers

    Russian Embassy Outraged at UK Media’s One-Sided Coverage of Skripal Case

    © AFP 2018 / ANDREW COWIE
    Europe
    Get short URL
    4311

    The Russian embassy in London has expressed bewilderment over how British media is handling the case of the poisoning of former spy Sergei Skripal, particularly its remarkable fidelity to a single unproven version of the incident.

    Freedom is diversity. With Russian media under constant pressure for not being "free" enough, British media has decided to provide an example of true Western freedom — by unequivocally stating that Russia poisoned British-Russian ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, in Salisbury, England.

    You would think the investigation into the incident had been wrapped up and the culprit — Moscow — found. But the investigation into the March 4 incident is still underway and new information is surfacing every day. Last week there was speculation that Skripal had been poisoned inside his car; this week, the story advanced by British police is that Skripal could have come in contact with the toxic nerve agent in his home.

    Of course, the job of the police is to work through evidence and propose scenarios — but in this, case British inspectors need not worry, because their media has solved the case without them.

    "Russian talk shows may have produced 24 or 234 versions of the Salisbury attack, but the British press is sticking to ONE, unsupported by any facts. So much for free and independent media holding government to account," the Russian Embassy in the UK said on its Twitter account on March 29. The post was accompanied by an image of various British newspapers' headlines, all pointing the finger at Russia for poisoning the Skripals.

    Fanning the flames of hype has become the trademark style of Western journalism, as colorfully illustrated by the famous allegations about "Russian hackers" and "Russian meddling" in US elections. Throughout 2016 and 2017, Western mainstream media kept blaming Russia for hacking political emails and interfering in the US and other elections, all the while doing their best to avoid providing any proof of their allegations. So the game being played by British journalists is old hat now.

    With Skripal's case, one key question has remained unvoiced for too long: what will the British media do if investigations reveal that Russia was not, in fact, involved? Will they pretend that all their past headlines never happened?

    Related:

    UK Media Want Gov't to Punish Russia by Grabbing Assets, Seizing Aeroflot Planes
    Corbyn Aide Reportedly Commits to Defense Cuts – Angering UK Media
    British Media Demonize Russia Hoping FIFA-2018 'Handed Back to UK' – Author
    UK, US, France Waging Media War Throughout Syrian Conflict - Envoy
    Media Reports Second UK Policeman 'in Hospital' After Skripal Poisoning
    Tags:
    newspapers, media coverage, media, Poisoning of Sergei Skripal, Russian embassy in UK, Russia, United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment