16:40 GMT24 November 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    Later this year, Serbia will take part in Collective Security Treaty Organization drills as a full-fledged member for the first time; the other six nations which comprise the regional military alliance are all close Russian allies and former Soviet republics.

    September 2017 will see Serbia's full-blown participation in the war games of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), according to media reports.

    The CSTO, which includes Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan, was set up by the former Soviet states in 1992 shortly after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in a bid to facilitate cooperation and strengthen security in the region.

    Serbia and Afghanistan have observer status at the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly.

    A Tigr armored SUV takes part in the Rubezh/Frontier-2016 tactical exercise involving military units of the CSTO's Collective Rapid-Deployment Forces. File photo
    © Sputnik / Mikhail Voskresenskiy
    A Tigr armored SUV takes part in the Rubezh/Frontier-2016 tactical exercise involving military units of the CSTO's Collective Rapid-Deployment Forces. File photo

    The upcoming CSTO drills, dubbed "Indestructible Brotherhood," will be held in Kazakhstan; Serbia's army and police units are due to take part.

    "Given that the Serbian military already participated in similar previous exercises involving Russia and Belarus, Belgrade's cooperation with the CSTO in this sector looks logical," Serbian political scientist Dusan Prorokovic told Sputnik.

    When asked whether it will add to strengthening Serbia's military neutrality, he signaled Belgrade's interest in the matter.

    At the same time, Prorokovic said that "if you look at the [recent] agreements signed by our country, they indicate Serbia's push for NATO rather than the CSTO."

    "In the past four years, Serbia has signed three agreements with NATO, including a very controversial individual partnership action plan (IPAP). We often participate in military exercises with the CSTO countries, but as far as the formalization of our relations is concerned, it is lagging behind," he pointed out.

    According to him, the best way to finally consolidate Serbia's neutral status is to pass a special law to supplement the current parliamentary resolutions, which Prorokovic said do not work.

    "By doing so, Serbia would have showed that it remains a neutral state and can continue to cooperate with the CSTO without being lectured to on the issue," he said.

    Late last month, Russian expert Alexander Pivovarenko told Sputnik that Belgrade's drive to continue its course towards closer integration with the EU while maintaining its friendship with Russia and China underscores the multi-vector nature of Serbian policy.

    "Serbia believes that it can build constructive and working relations with Brussels, Moscow, Washington, and Beijing. In general, Serbian policy is a multi-vector one, with Turkish and Arab investments also being in place in this policy. In other words, Serbia is at the crossroads of many vectors," Pivovarenko said.

    Earlier in March, then-Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic said that "the vast majority of Serbian citizens support the continuation of reforms, the continuation of the European path of development for Serbia as well as maintaining our traditional friendship with Russia and China."

    Vucic was elected as Serbian President in the first round of the elections, which were held on April 2.

    Never miss a story again — sign up to our Telegram channel and we'll keep you up to speed!


    Serbia Will Never Join NATO After Alliance's Aggression in 1999 - Serbian PM
    Democratic Party of Serbia Accuses US, NATO of Subtly Backing Kosovo Army Plans
    Serbia's New Missile Will Keep NATO at Bay (VIDEO)
    Russia and Serbia: Unwavering Brotherhood and Friendship
    Is EU Planning to Drive a Wedge Between Russia, Serbia?
    partnership, agreements, cooperation, drills, NATO, CSTO, Russia, Serbia
    Community standardsDiscussion