06:04 GMT +321 August 2019
Listen Live
    European Commission's President Jean-Claude Juncker delivers a speech as he makes his State of the Union address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg, eastern France, on September 14, 2016.

    No Silver Lining: 25 Years After Landmark EU Maastricht Deal

    © AFP 2019 / Frederick Florin
    Europe
    Get short URL
    264

    Friday, December 9, marks 25 years to the day that European leaders met finalize an agreement to be signed in the Dutch city of Maastricht that would change the face of Europe for a generation, but sow the seeds for the deep divisions it faces on its silver anniversary.

    Prior to December 1991, a group of European countries — initially France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg — had formed, via the Treaty of Rome 1957, the European Economic Community. Over the years, the trading bloc was enlarged to incorporate East Germany (post-reunification), Denmark, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Greece, Portugal and Spain.

    With other countries angling to join the club, calls grew for a formal single market, with allied extensions of powers and cooperation, which inevitably led to the Maastricht Treaty — the second major treaty of the EU as we know it, since the Treaty of Rome, 1957.

    The Maastricht Treaty created the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice and led to the creation of the single currency, the euro.

    Crucially, Maastricht led to the dropping of the word "Economic" from the title, as Europe moved towards political union. It signing, February 1992 and its entry into force, November 1993, marked a sea-change in the way Europe cooperated.

    Over time, enthusiasm — principally on the western European mainland — for further integration led to the signing of the Treaties of Amsterdam, Nice and Lisbon — all of which created the EU as it is known today.

    Herman Van Rompuy, the first full-time President of the European Council said: "Maastricht was a qualitative jump to further integration", which became enshrined in the mantra "ever closer union" that former UK Prime Minister David Cameron spend much of his time in the run-up to the Brexit referendum attempting to distance Britain from.

    Rise of the Right

    However, 25 years is a long time in European politics and the Brexit result as mirrored growing euroskepticism throughout what are now the 28 member states. The UK Independence Party in Britain forced the Brexit issue.

    The rise of Marine Le Pen's Front National in France, Alternative for Germany, Law & Justice (now in government in Poland), Geert Wilders' Party for Freedom PVV in the Netherlands, Golden Dawn in Greece, and may others have tapped into the rising antipathy towards the Brussels regime, which many see as too centrist.

    ​Even today's European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker admits Brussels has become too big and people across Europe want to take democracy and ownership back — not only to national levels, but to regional and local control.

    "Let's focus on the important matters and not regulate everything, certainly not when the rules affect the everyday lives of people.  And let's certainly not refer to the 'United States of Europe'. People don't care for that. They want to be Limburgers, or Luxembourgers, or Walloons, or Flemings, or Bavarians or Tyroleans," he told the 'Europe Calling!', Maastricht 25th anniversary meeting, December 9, in the Dutch city.

    New World Disorder

    However, others have new visions for the EU — not least former Belgian Prime Minister, Guy Verhofstadt, who leads the Liberals and Democrats (ALDE) Group in the European Parliament. He has just won support for a "drastic rationalisation" of the EU architecture.

    ​Verhofstadt is calling for the European Commission — currently the 'civil service' of the EU — to become "a real government". He wants the creation of a single Foreign Minister and Finance Minister, to take sole control of those competencies throughout the EU.

    Significantly, where now all the 28 governments thrash out deals between themselves before putting them to the various EU institutions, Verhofstadt sees the creation of "only one single Council — representing the states — that decides" and the total reform of the parliament — the elected representatives of the member states, to have total control over the budget, revenue and spending.

    Anti-EU banner. File photo
    © AP Photo / Darko Vojinovic
    Anti-EU banner. File photo

    Verhoftsadt's view of a new EU flies in the face of rising nationalism and opposition to the centralist doctrines of the Brussels (Strasbourg and Luxembourg) machines. The Europe envisaged 25 years ago in Maastricht faces completely new challenges.

    What had started as an economic trading bloc, became a political vehicle in 1991, which in 2016 is facing the realities of the new world order — or disorder — and the EU as it stands today will have to change if it is to survive. Verhoftstadt envisages further integration where others see disintegration. Another 25 years will tell.

    Related:

    EU Faces 'Ticking Clock' Over Brexit, Volatile Voters, Pessimism, Lack of Trust
    European Investment Bank Slammed as Latest Example of Lack of Trust in EU
    Beyond Brexit: Euroskepticism, Lack of EU Trust on the Rise Across Europe
    The EU's Third Wheel: How Italy Can Regain the Trust of France, Germany
    EU Chief Admits Europe Suffers From 'Pervasive Lack of Trust'
    Tags:
    anti-EU sentiment, rightwing, Brexit, nationalism, anti-austerity, Eurosceptic, Alternative for Germany (AfD), European Commission, European Parliament, European Council, Front National, UK Independence Party (UKIP), European Union, Jean-Claude Juncker, Europe, Lisbon, Nice
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik