19:52 GMT17 January 2021
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    Critics of the controversial EU-Canada trade deal - known as CETA - have slammed members of the European Parliament for blocking moves to refer part of it to the European Court of Justice out of pique because of the failure of the EU-US trade deal TTIP, Sputnik has been told.

    The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA is set to open up a free trade area between the 28 members of the EU and Canada, but — although it has been signed — faced opposition from within the European Parliament, where some MEPs — from the left and the Greens —attempted to send part of it to the European Court of Justice for legal opinion.

    The root of the opposition centered on the Investor State Dispute Settlement system, which would allow companies within the trade deal to take legal action, via a special tribunal, against a member state that applied legislation preventing the sale of goods by a company that would affect its profits.

    ​A majority of MEPs blocked the move, causing a row, with the Green coalition claiming there was a "clear-cut case" for asking the Court to express a view on whether the dispute resolution system was compatible with EU treaties.

    "Giving corporations a whole raft of legal new powers is not only wildly unpopular with people across Europe, it could very well be incompatible existing judicial systems in Europe. So if you have a trade deal that would have far-reaching implications for legal systems, surely the sensible thing to do would be to refer it to the experts on those legal systems so they could give it proper scrutiny before it came into force?" Kevin Smith, from Global Justice Now told Sputnik.

    Jerry Dias, National President of Canada's largest private sector union, Unifor said it was an "undemocratic start for an undemocratic deal."


    The CETA deal has faced similar opposition to the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement which US President Barack Obama had hoped would be signed before he left office.

    However, with growing opposition to the investor court dispute system as well as opposition from US President-elect Donald Trump, TTIP has been sidelined. Global Justice Now believes the MEPs who blocked the referral to the European Court of Justice did so out of a sense of "desperation."

    "It is desperation that is prompting MEPs to make such irresponsible decisions. Brussels has already been burnt after a tidal wave of people power stopped one toxic trade deal in its tracks (TTIP) and there is a sense amongst those who are deeply wedded to the process that they need to push something, anything through now, regardless of the consequences," Smith told Sputnik.

    ​"We are extremely disappointed that the majority of MEPs have chosen to reject our call to refer CETA to the European Court of Justice. Given the huge controversy around the deal, and the serious questions that have been asked regarding its compatibility with EU Treaties, there was a clear-cut case for asking the Court to express a view," said Heidi Hautala, who led the proposal on behalf of the Greens/EFA group.


    CETA is 'Much More Than Trade Treaty, It is About Sovereignty'
    CETA: Brussels 'Making Deals Behind Closed Doors Sends Bad Signal'
    CETA Deal Will Damage European Economy, Put 'Health and Safety' at Risk
    'A Siren Call': UN Expert Warns of Dire Consequences of CETA Trade Deal
    TTIP Deal 'Dead' After Trump's Victory in US Presidential Elections - Lawmaker
    The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), trade agreements, TTIP, Free Trade Agreement, Global Justice Now, European Commission, European Parliament, European Union, Donald Trump, Barack Obama, Europe, Canada, US
    Community standardsDiscussion