13:48 GMT +330 March 2017
Live
    Satanists Now Eye Arkansas to Erect Statue Outside Statehouse

    The Sects of Serbia: Who is More Dangerous, Satanists or Jehovah's Witnesses?

    © AP Photo/ The Satanic Temple
    Europe
    Get short URL
    3682654223

    Sects were especially active in Serbia in the "turbulent 90s," but their presence is still noticeable today. More often than not, disadvantaged groups of the population and young people fall under their influence, Serbian sectologist Sladjan Mijaljevic said in an interview to Sputnik.

    There is no official data on how many sects operate in Serbia. "First of all, that is because no one is in a hurry to do this work for the last 30 years. Such information appears only when some event happens: when a sectarian organization holds lectures, raises a stink at the cemetery, destroys monuments or performs some rituals. Only then the police department in charge of public order registers these events," Mijaljevic said.

    Any attempts and intentions to create a ministerial department to deal with the sects have always been strongly suppressed, the expert added. No one has ever received a permit to form such a body.

    The reasons behind this are related to the fact that sects are in the service of a new world order, Mijaljevic believes:

    "This is the fourth level of the people's enslavement: the first one is political, then economic, after that — military, and in the end, the spiritual enslavement. The aim is to create a kind of 'shopping mall' of different faiths and offer a 'product' to as many people as possible. Thus, the religious unity of the people is being destroyed."

    "Ten years ago, we had more than 300 different sects. In such a state of disorder and separation, it is very hard to resist the common enemy," Mijaljevic told Sputnik.

    According to the sectologist, some centers of influence have a very strong influence on the government leaders through their diplomatic missions.

    "Pressure comes from the embassies of the US, ​​Germany, France and the UK. For example, in 2010, about ten sects were officially recognized as religious organizations, even though they did not meet the law on religious organizations by 2006. It is a known fact that the US Ambassador of that time Michael Christian Polt invested much effort to win the recognition of Mormons as a religious community."

    Sects hide behind non-governmental organizations — it is one of the masks of their activities, Mijaljevic claimed.

    "Every serious sect has a certain number of people who are engaged in scientific work, humanitarian aid and work with the media. From time to time, they put forward candidates for president of the Serbian Academy of Sciences. All these are the masks that hide their activities; therefore some individuals realize that they are members of a sect only after a while. One sect was hiding under the guise of free English language courses," he explained.

    The specialist in sectology is certain of one thing: the idea that satanic sects are the most dangerous is a big mistake.

    "In order to make the so-called 'ritual murder,' it takes a decade, during which the person is under the influence of a satanic sect. Typically, people stay no longer than a few months in such communities. In my opinion, Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions, fuel much more serious concern. It is even hard to say how many people have died in Serbia over the last thirty years due to the fact that they abandoned the procedure," Sladjan Mijaljevic said.

    Related:

    Hungary Does It Right: Serbia Should Apply Hungarian Migrant Crisis Experience
    Serbia Accuses Kosovo of Trying to Enable Wiretapping of Phones
    Tags:
    sect, religion, Serbia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toRedBanner(Show commentHide comment)
      RedBanner, well, yes, I find that polytheistic religions suit the democratic mindset a lot better. You are quite right, of course. Stalin was a seminarist before he went revolutionary, there can be similarities in the symptoms. I'd prefer Bakunin and Kropotkin by the way.
    • RedBannerin reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      Bakunin, the founder of Anarchism once stated: "By striving to do the impossible, man has always achieved what is possible". I like that ;)

      Kropotkin, despite being also an anarchist, from what I remember was a bit different from Bakunin (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). But, as Bakunin, he opposed the Marxist idea of a dictatorship of the proletariat.

      Interesting revolutionaries, anyway.

      If any of them was alive today, they wouldn't be crucified (unless caught by Daesh...), but would simply be imprisoned for life, or worst...
      That shows how much Homo sapiens "evolved", in these last couple of centuries... ;)
    • Korz53
      Bring back Tito’s Communism !
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toRedBanner(Show commentHide comment)
      RedBanner, anarchists will always differ from each other somehow. Where Bakunin was more a man of practical experience, Kropotkin was more a scientist and philosopher so where Bakunin wanted to give examples, Kropotkin wanted to explain. It is one of the great tragedies of human history that Marxism and Anarchism never overcame their differences, it would have led to quite a different world today.
    • RedBannerin reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!, You're right on the differences between Bakunin and Kropotkin.

      As for Anarchism and Marxism overcoming their differences, I think that despite some similarities (especially in the early days) both are kind of incompatible, can't mix together, like water and oil ;)
    • avatar
      michael
      in answer to the original question - governments.
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toRedBanner(Show commentHide comment)
      RedBanner, Marxists want to take over the government and slowly dissolve the state, Anarchists want to remove it completely. Both want to reach a classless society of equals with a maximum of personal freedom in solidarity in the end. Marx took much pride in his scientific approach, meticulously analysing capitalism, as did Kropotkin, who for example researched nature to show the evolutionary advantages of mutual aid. Science is always about falsification and improvement. So like physicists are searching for a unified field theory, revolutionaries in search of the path to a human society free of oppression and an economy based on the satisfaction of needs instead of greed should strive for building a unified revolutionary theory. I think we can assume by now that Lenin for one has been falsified by experiment, as has been Lassalle. The difference to the religions is that both Marxists and Anarchists want to change human society in this life, not some imaginary other. The similarity is that both believe it can be done and that their path is the only correct one. Both Marxism and Anarchism claim to be based on scientific thought instead of superstition, so there should be a way to improve both theories. It will take some time, maybe centuries, maybe millennia of suffering, maybe it already is too late. Maybe they will end up as religion, as might have happened to one or other rebellious worker movement in roman times ;-)
    • RedBannerin reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      You're right of course. That is theoretically.
      But in the field, it never really happened that way.

      Take the former USSR as an example (where an elite of bureaucrats took the power and never let it go, ending up in bankruptcy, some 75 years after the October Revolution), or China today (which mixes the worst kind of capitalism on the economy with the rule of the Party on the political field), and we can go on and on with more examples of total failure in every other country where (alleged communists/Marxists) ruled for some time.

      Of course, as I believe it was Lenin who said it "communism can't succeed on an isolated island, it must be global" (not the exact words but not that far and the idea is there), when we now know this planet is ruled by just a few families, the banksters, who promote chaos everywhere, finance both sides of every war, and the same applies to weapons manufacturers... How can a real (R)Evolution succeed?... It can't, at least as long as Mankind as a whole won't wake up!

      You most certainly know and watched the film "V for Vendetta" . If by any chance you didn't I highly recommend it.
      The day Mankind, all together, will stand up against this hypocrite tyranny that enslaves us all, and where we try to survive, then there will be hope!
      ;)

      Cheers!
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toRedBanner(Show commentHide comment)
      RedBanner, over the last decade I grew quite fond of anarcho-syndicalism which combines the anarchist liberties of grassroots democracy with the robustness of a revolutionary organization and a federated internationalism. Unfortunately, it is completely marginalized today, and may need some remodeling to work effectively today. It is a bit more realistic than V, but it wíll need a lot more self-organized groups to start resistance before there will be a chance to rid ourselves of the oligarchs, the bureaucrats, the politicians, the priests, the bosses, the corporations and money. That is a bit like quitting smoking, it may not work at the first try, and never if you don't try again in earnest until you succeed ;-)
    • avatar
      florsolitariain reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      "I reckon Christians would crucify Christ again"

      Nice talmudic lie. It was the Romans who crucified Christ at the request of the Jews. The Jews naturally would crucify him again if they could. See ? Truth is simple.

      Satanists worship Satan, that's why they call themselves satanists. Are you ashamed of your master that you're twisting into a pretzel just not to admit that you worship him ?
      Talmud and Kabbalah are also satanic.
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toflorsolitaria(Show commentHide comment)
      florsolitaria, I do not discuss such matters with antisemitic simpletons and religious nutcases.
    • avatar
      florsolitariain reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      Most people are getting sick and tired of the talmudic pilpulism.
      Must be painful for you to see that.. when (((you))) (in the plural) feel so close to (((your))) goal.
      But Satan is a tricky master. He betrays his followers, too.
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toflorsolitaria(Show commentHide comment)
      florsolitaria, go get professional help.
    • avatar
      florsolitariain reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      I have a little advice for you, if you want your propaganda to be more successful - keep it short.
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toflorsolitaria(Show commentHide comment)
      florsolitaria, as good as nobody reads the comments here, so it really is not about propaganda, just a (more or less) friendly exchange of different opinions, as far as it goes. By the way, you seem to take this satan business quite seriously. Do you believe in the existence of satan then? Isn't that quite a contradiction to the monotheistic setup of your christian god (by the way, the same god as the one the jews worship, since christianity is nothing but a doomsday sect based on judaism that embarrassingly failed to reach their announced doomsday - and the same god that the muslims worship as allah, they even recognize jesus as a prophet).
    • avatar
      florsolitariain reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      Not the same god at all. Christians worship the true God/Jesus Christ.
      Jews and Muslims worship a talmud-inspired god, aka Satan.
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toflorsolitaria(Show commentHide comment)
      florsolitaria, they might have a different opinion about this. From what I now about christian scripture, it is mostly a fake, a mixture of Judaism, the cult of Orpheus, and a number of other popular religious motives of antiquity. There is nothing really special or inventive about it. Mohammed had to invent his own marketing pitch to sell islam as the "reconstructed original" but what would you expect from an experienced merchant? As far as judaism is concerned - they borrowed heavily from zarathustra and the egypt aton cult. In my opinion the petty tiffs between all their believers is a bit boring. By the way - if there is only one god, as all these monotheisms claim, then there can be no other god. So the one they worship most logically be the same. So if there exists any such entity such as Satan, it must be the Mr. Hyde to god's Dr. Jekyll. Which would explain a lot about this world, if the ruling spirit is a maniac-depressive psychopath...
    • avatar
      florsolitariain reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      That's what they teach you in the talmood class about Christianity, naturally.
      But luckily the Ruling Deity has finally had enough with your evil, and He will let you overreach yourself. And probably destroy the world in the process, but anything is better than being slaves of the Joos.
    • Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!in reply toflorsolitaria(Show commentHide comment)
      florsolitaria, you are quite mad... and probably a C'thulhu cultist without even knowing.
    • avatar
      florsolitariain reply toПролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!(Show commentHide comment)
      Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!,
      I didn't mean you personally, hasby, but (((you))) in the plural. This comments system doesn't allow correcting after publishing.
      Check out Dugin's last video on Ju Tube, and you'll see what I mean. And while you're there you might wanna look up Nazino Island. Also related to the JWO.
    Show new comments (0)