16:47 GMT +306 December 2019
Listen Live
    Former PricewaterhouseCoopers employee Antoine Deltour (C) and his lawyer William Bourdon (R) are escorted by police as they leave the court after the first day of the LuxLeaks trial in Luxembourg, April 26, 2016.

    LuxLeaks Trial Begins Amid Claims of Whistleblower 'Intimidation'

    © REUTERS / Vincent Kessler
    Get short URL
    0 56

    Three men who exposed the way hundreds of firms enjoyed the benefits of a benign tax regime by routing money through Luxembourg in a series of "sweetheart deals" went on trial Tuesday (April 26) amid allegations of "intimidation" by the authorities.

    Two former employees at services firm PwC, Antoine Deltour and Raphael Halet, and journalist Edouard Perrin go on trial facing charges over the leak of thousands of documents that exposed the LuxLeaks scandal.

    The scandal emerged when the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists released a series of documents exposing Pepsi, IKEA, AIG, Coach, Deutsche Bank, Abbott Laboratories and nearly 340 other companies which had secured secret deals from Luxembourg that allowed many of them to slash their global tax bills. 

    Since then, the European Commission ruled that Luxembourg and the Netherlands have granted selective tax advantages to Fiat Finance and Trade and Starbucks, respectively. These are illegal under EU state aid rules.

    However, Deltour, Halet and journalist Edouard Perrin all face charges over the affair. Former auditor Deltour and Halet are accused of stealing documents from the database of the accounting firm PwC, Halet is further charged with being behind a separate leak and Perrin — the journalist who originally exposed the story — is charged with being an accomplice to all the charges.


    EU lawmaker Fabio De Masi, from the German Linke party said, ahead of the trial:

    "Luxembourg's judiciary is trying to intimidate those who have unveiled some of the dirty secrets of the Grand Duchy. Without people like Deltour and Perrin, neither the public nor the European Parliament would have been aware of the massive scope of tax dumping in the EU. And the European Commission would not have been in a position to significantly extend its state aid investigations on tax rulings across all Member States."

    The Commission found that Luxembourg has granted selective tax advantages to Fiat's financing company and the Netherlands to Starbucks' coffee roasting company. In each case, a tax ruling issued by the respective national tax authority artificially lowered the tax paid by the company.

    The European Parliament set up a special investigation panel, known as the TAXE committee, to look into tax practices within the union. However, plans to extend its powers to look far wider into how much Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Eurogroup chief Jeroen Dijsselbloem knew about the tax practices have been scuppered.

    Juncker was finance minister and prime minister of Luxembourg during the time the special tax deals were made. Dijsselbloem has been finance minister in the Netherlands since 2012.


    European Parliament Set to Boost Tax Scam Inquiry Following Panama Papers
    LuxLeaks, Panama Papers and EU Hypocrisy: Piketty Slams Brussels Over Tax
    Le Big Bill: French Tax Officials Accuse McDonald's of Supersizing Profits
    EU Tax Code Derided as a 'Parody of Transparency'
    Campaigners Slam EU Tax Avoidance Deal Over Reporting Secrecy
    tax avoidance, tax evasion, whistleblowers, trial, leaked documents, LuxLeaks, European Commission, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC), European Union, Jean-Claude Juncker, Europe, Luxembourg
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik