04:54 GMT02 December 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    0 91

    The European Commission has ruled the so-called sweetheart tax deal - worth between US$23 and US$34 million - brokered between the Dutch Government and both Starbucks and Fiat Finance is illegal, in a move set to embarrass European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker.

    Juncker was Prime Minister of Luxembourg from 1995 to 2013, as well as Minister for Finances from 1989 to 2009, during which period the special tax arrangements were made. The 'sweetheart tax' agreement allowed the multinationals to channel their European profits through the Netherlands to drastically reduce their tax liabilities in other member states.

    The European Commission has decided that Luxembourg and the Netherlands granted selective tax advantages to Fiat Finance and Trade and Starbucks, respectively. These are illegal under EU state aid rules.

    Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, stated:

    "Tax rulings that artificially reduce a company's tax burden are not in line with EU state aid rules. They are illegal. I hope that, with today's decisions, this message will be heard by Member State governments and companies alike. All companies, big or small, multinational or not, should pay their fair share of tax."

    Following in-depth investigations, which were launched in June 2014, the Commission concluded that Luxembourg has granted selective tax advantages to Fiat's financing company and the Netherlands to Starbucks' coffee roasting company.

    In each case, a tax ruling issued by the respective national tax authority artificially lowered the tax paid by the company.

    Dutch 'Surprise'

    In a statement, the commission said:

    "The two tax rulings under investigation endorsed artificial and complex methods to establish taxable profits for the companies. They do not reflect economic reality."

    The Commission has ordered Luxembourg and the Netherlands to recover the unpaid tax from Fiat and Starbucks, respectively, in order to remove the unfair competitive advantage they have enjoyed and to restore equal treatment with other companies in similar situations.

    The amounts to recover are US$23 — US$34 million (€20 — €30 million) for each company. It also means that the companies can no longer continue to benefit from the advantageous tax treatment granted by these tax rulings.

    In a statement, the Dutch Government said it was "surprised" at the ruling, saying:

    "The Netherlands is convinced that actual international standards are applied."

    Juncker has always denied being part of any special tax deal with multinationals, telling a committee of lawmakers in September:

    "The Luxembourg tax authorities are very allergic to the idea of political interference. I think you have an exaggerated idea of the power of the prime minister in this particular respect."

    The Commission is investigating a number of other cases where tax rulings may give rise to state aid issues, concerning Apple in Ireland, Amazon in Luxembourg, and a Belgian tax scheme.


    Row Breaks Out Between Brussels Bureaucrats Over Data Privacy Ruling
    Doubts Grow Over Fight Against Big Business Tax Evasion
    EU Fails to Nail Multinational Tax Evaders
    EU Lawmakers Threaten Multinationals with Sanctions Over Tax Probe
    corporations, economic aid, deal, tax evasion, business, investigation, tax breaks, aid, tax, European Commission, Fiat, Starbucks, Jean-Claude Juncker, Europe, Luxembourg, Netherlands
    Community standardsDiscussion