The inquiry seeks to uncover the operations of the United Kingdom in the Iraq War, including British policies and military action. The key delay is caused by a dispute over the publication of correspondence between Blair and Bush, the inquiry chairman said.
MOSCOW (Sputnik) – Sir John Chilcot, who chairs an inquiry into Britain's role in the Iraq War, said Wednesday the publication of the report was significantly delayed over the declassification of conversations between then UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and former US President George W. Bush.
The inquiry panel, which started work in 2009, had to analyze some 150,000 government documents covering a nine-year period, Chilcot told parliamentarians while giving evidence on delays in the preparation of the report.
The key delay was caused by a dispute over the publication of correspondence between Blair and Bush, the inquiry chairman said, adding that it took 13 months to reach a conclusion in September 2013.
Chilcot added that publication of the report was also stalled because of the scope and complexity of the inquiry.
The current inquiry seeks to uncover the operations of the United Kingdom in the Iraq War, including British policies and military action.
The inquiry report, known as the Chilcot report, was to be published by the end of 2014, but according to UK Cabinet Office Minister Lord Wallace, the government had decided it would be inappropriate to publish the report prior to the UK general election in May.
On January 7, Prime Minister David Cameron described the delay in publishing the Chilcot report as "immensely frustrating" and said that it was not in his power to grant its publication.
The invasion of Iraq in 2003 aimed to eliminate weapons of mass destruction believed to have been held by the late Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. The war claimed the lives of more than 100,000 civilians between 2003 and 2011, according to the Iraq Body Count database.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.