03:36 GMT +315 December 2019
Listen Live
    Climate change

    Over 15,000 Scientists Sign 'Warning to Humanity' About Environmental Disaster

    © CC0
    Get short URL

    Over 15,000 scientists from 184 countries have signed a "Warning to Humanity" about the dangers of environmental damage that is being wreaked on the planet.

    The letter is thought to have the most support ever for a scientific article, with a total of 15,372 signatures from researchers across a range of scientific disciples. 

    Entitled "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice," the letter recalls a previous warning made by world scientists in 1992 that humans "were on a collision course with the natural world."

    They cited concerns about the rapidly increasing human population, and implored for the stabilization of the human population, to cut greenhouse gas emissions, reduce deforestation and reverse the trend of collapsing biodiversity.

    ​However, the scientists have now issued a second warning, since the last one was not heeded. The Earth's human population has swelled by another 2 billion people since 1992, an increase of 35%.

    The "current trajectory of potentially catastrophic climate change" due to burning fossil fuels, deforestation and agricultural production is "especially troubling," they write in the letter, published in the journal BioScience on Monday.

    "Moreover, we have unleashed a mass extinction event, the sixth in roughly 540 million years, wherein many current life forms could be annihilated or at least committed to extinction by the end of this century."


    A Deeper View of Life: Environmental Photographer of the Year 2017
    Russia and Norway Create Unique Cultural Environment in Arctic – Governor
    Environmental Watchdog Warns of Existing Nuclear Threat in Europe
    Swedes Recommended to Stop Making Babies for the Sake of Environment
    US Environmental Agency Approves Emergency Fuel Waivers
    deforestation, overpopulation, danger, environment, climate change, Earth
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik