08:19 GMT14 August 2020
Listen Live
    Environment
    Get short URL
    0 54
    Subscribe

    Hydraulic fracturing, otherwise called fracking, refers to the extraction of shale gas through the injection of high pressure liquid into soil. The technique has stirred up controversy in Europe and the US, prompting public protests.

    MOSCOW, December 17 (Sputnik) — Pollution from fracking could pose a real threat to people's lives, yet many regulations have failed to effectively limit the amount of pollution that fracking companies cause, a recent report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) of the United States has said.

    "Research has linked pollution from fracking to unhealthy levels of smog and of toxic air contaminants. Exposure to this pollution can cause eye, nose, and throat irritation, respiratory illnesses, central nervous system damage, birth defects, cancer, or premature death. At the same time, the oil and gas industry has been exempted from many regulations that limit air pollution from industrial activity," the NRDC report published this week said.

    The report added that the standards adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at the US federal government, have not been without gaps.

    "State regulations are patchy and enforcement often cannot keep up with the industry's rapid expansion, resulting in insufficient protection from air pollutants," the report added.

    Hydraulic fracturing, otherwise called fracking, refers to the extraction of shale gas through the injection of high pressure liquid into soil. The technique has stirred up controversy in Europe and the United States, prompting public protests.

    The primary concerns over fracking include contaminated groundwater, increased carbon emissions, which is caused by leaking methane gas, and even earthquakes.

    The NRDC report is just of the many warnings that have been issued by environmental groups.

    An October report published by the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) claimed that benzene, an ingredient used for fracking, represents a far more toxic threat to drinking water supplies and public health than diesel.

    Furthermore, a report published in November by the Chief Scientific Adviser of the UK Government Mark Walport held that fracking "has the potential to be as damaging as thalidomide, tobacco and asbestos." Walport's report also said that as well as water contamination, fracking could constitute one of the biggest threats to human health in the last 60 years.

    Apart from causing damage to health, fracking is likely to lead to economic and marine damage.

    Early in October, a group of British farmers objected that they would sustain financial losses if fracking projects went ahead since people might stop buying produce grown above fracking sites. Similarly, a report published by the Center for Biological Diversity concluded that fracking poses a threat to California's ocean, air and seismic stability.

    Greenpeace has repeatedly opposed suggestions that fracking would curtail greenhouse gas emissions. The group says that there is no scientific evidence for the alleged advantages. According to the environmental group's US office, fracking "is wreaking havoc on communities and the environment across the country."

    Yet, some governments, especially those of the United Kingdom and the United States, have so far spoken out in favor of fracking. According to both governments, fracking would contribute to greater energy security as well contribute more jobs and tax revenue.

    Related:

    UK Parliamentary Candidate Slams Police Over Fracking Debate Names Request
    Over 200 UK Activist Groups Urge Prime Minister Cameron to Ban Fracking
    Hillary Clinton Expresses Concern Over Fracking, Avoids Keystone XL
    Germany Eyes Fracking to Fill Energy Gap
    US Fracking Its Way to Ukraine
    Tags:
    ecology, environment, fracking, United States, Europe
    Community standardsDiscussion