Given that US military forces killed hundreds of civilians in the same city back in 2004 and bequeathed a deadly radioactive legacy to the population from depleted uranium munitions, such belated American concern for civilian life in Fallujah does not sound credible.
Could there be another agenda, such as preventing Iraqi forces from delivering a knock-out blow to the IS militants (also known as Daesh) holed up inside the city?
Although the US is officially waging a war to defeat these jihadists, the terrorists are, at the same time, documented to function covertly as Pentagon assets for regime change in neighboring Syria.
This week, US government-owned news outlet Voice of America ran this headline on Monday: “Concerns over civilian suffering as Iraqi forces surround Fallujah.” The headline’s wording was subsequently changed in later VOA editions after Iraqi forces actually began their offensive on the Daesh stronghold.
Daesh militants first occupied Fallujah in early 2014, and along with the northern Iraqi city of Mosul and eastern Syria’s Raqqa, it formed part of the cross-border triangular axis of the self-proclaimed Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
Retaking Fallujah would thus be a crucial strategic victory for the Iraqi government forces against the extremist group. It is believed that Fallujah, which is only 50 km from Baghdad, has been a major source of suicide bombers who have killed hundreds of civilians in the Iraqi capital over the past two years. Three suicide attacks earlier this week reportedly killed at least 20 people in greater Baghdad.
What seems curious is the apparent concern for civilian safety in Fallujah as expressed in the US and Western media.
This is the same city that was almost razed to the ground by American and British forces during two major battles in 2004 – one year after the US-led invasion of Iraq and the fall of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. The Fallujah resistance was then made up mainly of Sunni militia.
During the US-British assaults on Fallujah, it is estimated that more than 1,000 civilians were killed – a disturbingly high casualty toll, similar to that incurred by the armed militants. The Americans spared no effort to crush the resistance – deploying over 10,000 troops, warplanes, 2,000-pound aerial bombs, helicopter gunships, howitzers and snipers in what was reckoned to have been the fiercest fighting by US forces since the Vietnam War. The US military even blared rock music at deafening levels in order to draw out protesters who would then be cut down by sniper fire.
But the killing of civilians did not stop when those battles ended. Years after the artillery smoke cleared, the people of Fallujah have been battling alarming cancer rates and horrific birth defects as a result of the depleted uranium munitions that the American forces bombarded the city with in 2004. Millions of rounds of this highly toxic metal are believed to have been fired by US forces during their assaults on Fallujah.
Several scientific studies, conducted by Iraqi and foreign medics, have since reported that the rate of cancer, childhood leukemia and fatal birth deformities have increased several-fold in Fallujah since the US-British military offensives against the city in 2004. In one study, it was found that the incidence of birth defects in Fallujah were higher than those recorded in Hiroshima or Nagasaki – the Japanese cities hit by US atomic bombs in 1945.
In addition to toxic uranium, US forces also indiscriminately used massive quantities of White Phosphorus as incendiary weapon against the city. One investigative Italian television documentary, The Hidden Massacre, confirmed numerous local reports that people had died from grotesque skin burns inflicted by the White Phosphorus.
At the time of the offensives, the US military claimed that the phosphorus was being used as illuminating flares in order to target combatants. A year later, in November 2005, the Pentagon finally admitted that the chemical was actually used as an “incendiary weapon”. US troops on the ground callously referred to the White Phosphorus bombardments in Fallujah as “shake and bake” operations, because of the twin-effect of inciting terror in the target population and burning victims down to the bone. A victim’s head could be completely incinerated while the rest of the body remained unscathed.
The question is: is this duplicitous Western focus on Fallujah, then and now a reflection of mere hypocrisy or double-think? Or is there a more nuanced agenda?
The Iraqi military, going into Fallujah, are supported by Iranian and Shia militia, as well as – at least officially – by US air power.
However, Iraqi military commanders have said that US forces were reluctant about launching the latest offensive on Fallujah. In one live report Monday, CNN’s Ben Wedeman quoted Iraqi military sources as saying that American commanders wanted the assault to instead concentrate on the northern city of Mosul.
Which raises the question: why is the US military reluctant about taking out Fallujah from the terror triangle that straddles Iraq and Syria? If Fallujah were to fall – as Iraqi military commanders seem confident of – then that surely would spell a decisive defeat for Daesh militants both in Iraq and in Syria.
Washington’s covert relationship with the jihadist terror groups is mercurial. It is known that elements within Washington – the CIA and Pentagon – have covertly supported the terror network as a proxy for regime change and other political ends. On the other hand, Washington is also avowedly waging a war to defeat the terrorists, with air strikes in Syria and Iraq and ground support for the Iraqi army.
One such contradiction is the seeming reluctance of the US military to support the Iraqi assault on Fallujah to terminate Daesh.
Could it be that the US – or elements within its power structure – does not really want to see its terrorist proxies wiped out entirely because of Washington’s ongoing hidden agenda for regime change in Syria?
Hence the purported concerns expressed in US and the Western media over “civilians being injured” during the Iraqi army assault this week on Fallujah. It seems to be a conniving attempt to restrain the campaign against Daesh, rather than destroy the terrorists.
When were civilian casualties ever the cause of misgivings during the US and British blitzkrieg on Fallujah in 2004?
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.