19:43 GMT +327 October 2016
    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan

    Is the US Turning On Erdogan?

    Get short URL
    Andrew Korybko

    As unlikely as it may have sounded just under one year ago, the geostrategic situation has remarkably changed to such an extent that it now looks conceivable that the US might be ready to turn on Erdogan.

    Erdogan's decision to shoot down the Russian anti-terrorist jet over Syria can be considered the turning point at which the US began to distance itself from the Turkish strongman. While most commentators were in hysterics during that time about the potential for a Third World War, the author calmly analyzed in the article "Why's The US Hanging Turkey Out To Dry?" that not only would the US fail to support Turkey in any possible war with Russia, but that Washington will actually intensify its operations to destabilize Ankara through its doubling down of support for the Syrian Kurds.

    Since then, other analysts such as CounterPunch contributor Mike Whitney have recently come along to sharing that conclusion, signaling that the theory is gaining traction and that the US might consider reversing its erstwhile steadfast support for the Turkish leader.

    While Washington has certainly demonstrated mixed signals in this regard over the past couple of months, it might just commit to implicitly supporting a regime change scenario against Erdogan in order to safeguard the strategic gains that it's accomplished thus far with the Immigrant Crisis.

    Building the Case

    Three recent events in particular signify that the US is no longer providing unconditional and unwavering support for Erdogan:

    Syrian Kurds:

    The US does not recognize any of the anti-Daesh Kurdish militias in Syria as being terrorist groups, and by training, arming, and supporting them with airstrikes, the US is sending a strong message to Turkey that it doesn't care about its geopolitical sensitivities and will continue to pursue its own grand strategy in Syria regardless of its ally's objections.

    Cessation of Hostilities Agreement:

    The Russian-American joint proposal to stop the fighting in Syria was a masterstroke of diplomacy that simplified the battlefield situation and has made it much easier to identity the "good moderates" from the "bad terrorists", according to an exclusive Sputnik interview that Ekaterina Blinova conducted with The Saker, the pseudonym for a former military analyst and popular blogger on Russian affairs. His comments about a "binary setup" whereby "those who cease fighting are integrated into the political process (and) all others are designated for annihilation" infer that Russia and the US de-facto recognize Turkey's local proxies as terrorist organizations, which represents a complete reversal of American policy.

    Aegean NATO Mission:

    Erdogan is incensed that the US and a handful of its NATO allies want to patrol the Aegean Sea to intercept and send back the boatloads of immigrants that are incessantly reaching Greece's shores. There were even earlier reports that Turkey had flat-out refused to cooperate in this mission, although Turkish military representatives later officially refuted those claims. 

    The bone of contention is obvious, and it partly rests in the simmering and unresolved slew of territorial disputes that Turkey has with Greece and which a Sputnik article previously referred to as the "Battle Over The Aegean". Erdogan is anxious that the US and its partners will take Athens' side in this spat and use the immigrant-intercepting mission as a cover for establishing military ‘facts on the water' that play to Greece's advantage.

    The Turkish leader's greatest fear, however, is that the mission will succeed beyond its wildest expectations and return hundreds of thousands of departing, destitute, and dissatisfied immigrants back to his country's shores and consequently destabilize the already politically fragile Turkish society.

    Mixed Signals

    Despite all the evidence pointing to the US getting ready to turn on Erdogan, Washington has characteristically sent some mixed signals on the matter in order to prevent its "partner" from panicking and to keep him in a suspended state of strategic uncertainty:

    Anti-Kurdish Bombs:

    The Pentagon just gave its stamp of approval to a deal in which the US has agreed to sell $680 million worth of bunker-busting "smart bombs" to its Turkish counterparts, which the International Business Times describes as being for use against the Kurds. This indicates that the US draws a differentiating line between its support for the Syrian and Anatolian Kurds by sticking to its designation of the PKK as a "terrorist organization" and supporting Ankara's brutal war against it.

    The Israeli Privilege:

    Even the US' assistance to the Syrian Kurds has its limits, it seems, with Mike Whitney pointing out in his earlier-cited article that the US "acknowledged Turkey's "right to defend itself", which is an expression the US reserves for Israel when it conducting one of its murderous rampages in the West Bank or Gaza Strip."

    By bestowing Turkey with the Israeli Privilege, Washington is tacitly giving Ankara the green light to carry out limited, low-intensity cross-border shelling of the Syrian Kurds so long as it refrains from a conventional ground invasion against them.

    EU Membership Support:

    The US is an advocate of Turkish admission into the EU out of the self-interest that it has in having its Mideast partner behave as the ultimate Trojan Horse and sabotage the bloc from within.

    Accepting Turkey into the EU or even giving its citizens visa-free access to the Schengen Zone (like last year's €3 billion immigrant deal stipulated will eventually happen) would essentially institutionalize and legalize the Immigration Crisis' ongoing processes of destabilization by opening "a gateway for further immigration and [flow of] refugees to Germany", according to Vice-President of the Bundestag Johannes Singhammer.

    To bring the reader up to speed, the objective behind this is to handicap the EU via a chain reaction of socio-political crises that renders it incapable of pragmatic bilateral cooperation with the multipolar powers of Russia and China, a strategy which the author described more comprehensively in an earlier Sputnik piece available here.

    Engineering Erdogan's Ouster

    The Problem:

    The events of the past year have proven that Erodgan's policy of Neo-Ottomanism has been a colossal failure in the Mideast and are partly responsible for why he agreed to the US' suggestion to shift his strategic focus to Europe, the southeastern region of which was also previously colonized by the Turks for around half a millennium and therefore seen as ‘fair game' for his expansionist Sultan-like ideology.

    Turkey was on the cusp of greatly facilitating this and the corresponding institutionalization of the Immigrant Crisis when its citizens were promised eventual visa-free travel privileges to the EU, but Ankara and the US encountered a major problem — Erdogan himself.

    The Turkish strongman is so reviled all throughout Europe because of his facilitative role in the Immigrant Crisis and his publicized support of Daesh that the EU elite have a substantiated fear that inking the historic visa-free travel deal with a person that their citizens believe is so notoriously dangerous, duplicitous, and undependable could lead to a full-scale revolt against them. From the US perspective, this might lead to anti-Atlantic/pro-Eurasian leaders and parties simultaneously coming to power in key countries all throughout the bloc and rapidly undermining Washington's hegemony over this space.

    The Solution:

    The public could largely be mollified, however, if Erdogan were removed from power and a friendlier face signed the agreement instead, thereby mitigating the chances that they'd immediately revolt and gradually securing the US' long-term strategy (the "boiling frog" approach).

    The most realistic way that the US might do this if they were so inclined is through a Color Revolution or military coup against the Turkish President, both of which are mutually compatible with their end-game strategic vision.

    Russia's economic countermeasures to Turkey's aggression against it have already had a substantial impact on all of its social classes, and the country has a preexisting and popular opposition movement that seems prepared to capitalize off of this. Furthermore, the southeast of the country is already aflame in civil war and Daesh terrorists have repeatedly infiltrated Turkey and carried out several attacks within it so far. In such a precarious situation, the straws that break the camel's back could easily be the Immigrant Crisis and the War on the Kurds, both of which the US could easily aggravate.

    Pertaining to the former, the US could make sure that the NATO Aegean Mission is a success and that the hundreds of thousands of prospective immigrants are sent back to Turkey to tip the delicate social balance there over to violence, just as they're presently doing in Europe. In parallel, it could provide more state-of-the-art arms to the Syrian Kurds, who have previously been accused of funneling them to the PKK for use against the Turkish military.

    Simultaneously faced with deteriorating and riotous social conditions mixed with an uncontrollably escalating civil war, the combination of a Color Revolution and Unconventional War (together, Hybrid War) would likely be enough to bring the opposition to power or stimulate a reactive military coup, which either way would result in a new pro-American leadership coming to power and signing the visa-free deal, albeit this time without any considerable opposition from the European electorate.

    The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.


    US Welcomes Court Ruling to Release 2 Detained Turkish Journalists
    Saudi Jets to Launch Missions From Turkish Airbase Upon US Order - Riyadh
    US, Saudi Arabia, Turkey Uphold Syrian Ceasefire 'Only to Buy Time'
    US Citizens Cautioned Against Visiting Southeast Turkey - State Department
    All States Should Abide by Russia-US Truce Plan for Syria – Ex-Turkish FM
    Kiev Supported by EU, US, Turkey, Canada in Trade Dispute With Russia
    US, Russia Deal on Syria to Clarify Turkish Role in Conflict – Lawmaker
    'No Ifs or Buts': Turkey Demands US Support Against Kurdish YPG
    Turk Tail Wags US Dog
    Will US War Party Authorize Turkish-Saudi Military Adventure in Syria?
    Syria, United States, Turkey
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • iamgogmagog666
      The EU should oust both Turkey and the US from Europe for the sake of their citizens. With either of those countries in the EU there will always be problems created by them that will destabilize their countries.
    • FlorianGeyer
      My money would be on the US bribing Turkish military officers and instigating a military coup.
      In the name of 'Western Democratic Values' naturally.
    • No Namein reply toFlorianGeyer(Show commentHide comment)

      ..... naturally. :-))
    • No Namein reply toiamgogmagog666(Show commentHide comment)

      EU IS A Birderberg-action, that means that the Council of Foreign Relations has its tail in the matter. The Rotschilds, the Rockefellers with their housenegs Kissing* and Soros and the whole so-called "EU-Supergovernment"
      That means that, every time you see that ol' crap Heinz the Rat brokering some DEAL with P.utin, it means that the Rockefellers sent him.
    • Ann
      Great article. This writer seems to "get it" - the US' long-term strategy (the "boiling frog" approach). The US will eventually have to collapse the EU as well, if it intends to dominate the world, and there's no reason to believe that that ideology has changed. What had better change, is the eyes of Europeans need to open up and see what lies in their immediate future, and act accordingly.

      Their leaders won't do it - so the people have to.
    • Ann in reply toiamgogmagog666(Show commentHide comment)
      iamgogmagog666, agreed.
    • Ann in reply toNo Name(Show commentHide comment)
      No Name, and that does not mean that Putin has ACCEPTED anything. Kissinger can ask all he wants, but Russia will never knowingly submit to being dominated...not even if they try to starve them and/or bomb them into submission. I get tired of western people accusing Putin of being a sell-out to the NWO...if he was, he could've done that long ago, without all of the fighting and struggle. He would've looked a lot like merkel...
    • jas
      I sometimes play with the idea that Erdogan and Turkey were the targets all along.
    • Glamoureus
      Good article but it needs to go deeper on some level.

      1. It is clear since the shoot down of SU-27 that Turkey will not gain EU membership or any improvement of Turkish membership for at least 20 year, even longer if nothing radical changed. This because most EU countries are already in crisis both by economy and by money migrants from Turkey.

      2. US cannot afford losing Erdogan, he is like a gate keeper for black oacen towards Russia. A Pro-Russian Turkey would kick out US from one of its most stratigic hedge against Russia

      3. Turkey is not keeping refugees because of humanitarian reasons, Turkey hasnt even ratificide the UN declaration of refugees rather forces the refugees to work as cheap labour and paying a percent in order to not be sent back to Syria/afghanistan/pakistan etc

      4. This makes Erdogan able to behaving badly, but as tile goes by he will kick out unwanted humans, he IS kicking out his own Kurds hence any refugee is as much of value.

      5. The kick-out non wanted process will go on for ages and will undermine Europe more and more, as said earlier, the crisis is already there. It's not a sustainable situation and there will finally be some kind of exit of EU countries.

      6. Once the exit starts, several countries will go into alliance against islamic invation, other will be high-jacked and divided societies.

      7. New social economical and geopolitical changes will stop the refugee flow from Turkey and Turkey will start dealing with the refugees internally .

      8. Possibly Turkey will get same war as Syria has if EU breaks and turns away from Turkey.
    • vigilante
      I fully agree with this article. The USA and Russia have been setting traps to Turkey in order to weaken it and destabilizing enough to trigger a coup.
    Show new comments (0)

    Top stories