The Russian Embassy in Germany has responded to recent remarks by the Polish ambassador about Nord Stream 2’s alleged threat to Warsaw and the European Union, stressing that that the infrastructure megaproject is being implemented in full compliance with European legislation and for Europe’s own benefit.
Last week, Polish Ambassador Andrzej Przylebski urged Berlin and the European Union to take a tougher line on Russia, suggesting that Nord Stream 2 is problematic because it will supposedly allow Russia to receive huge sums of cash, which Moscow then pour into its military.
“What bothers us most is that Russia is getting even more money for its military spending [via Nord Stream 2]. Vladimir Putin already has the most modern technologies in the military field. It’s odd that Germany supports sanctions on the one hand, and on the other gives Putin huge sums of money for military spending. Europeans shouldn’t do that. We should weaken the Russians,” Przylebski said, speaking to Germany’s RND news agency.
The diplomat went on to suggest that although Poles “have a great affinity for Russia”, including Russian music and films, Warsaw is “also prepared to fight [the Russians] if necessary”. Moscow, he said, “needs to come to its senses now”.
Responding to Przylebski’s remarks on Friday, the Russian Embassy suggested that the diplomat’s “belligerent rhetoric” and “openly hostile tone” were “both disappointing and disconcerting”, adding that “it seems that singing Russian songs and watching Russian movies have not taught him anything”.
“Russia has no plans to attack anyone,” the Embassy stressed. “Russia’s military expenditures are formed on the basis of the principle of ‘necessary sufficiency’ to ensure a reliable defence capability. Incidentally, Russian spending is 24 times below that of the total military expenditures of NATO countries. And it is not Russia, but the countries of the alliance, which are moving their strike groups further and further to the east.”
According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, Russia spent the equivalent of $60.6 billion on defence in 2020. For comparison, the United States alone spent over twelve times that during the same period, while NATO spent over a trillion dollars on defence, with alliance members making up six of the top fifteen spenders (and other US allies, including Japan, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Australia and Israel accounting for most of the rest). Despite this spending, US and NATO officials have repeatedly reprimanded some countries, including Germany, for their failure to ramp up defence spending to a minimum of 2 percent of GDP.
As for Ambassador Przylebski’s remarks about the need “weaken Russia” by stopping Nord Stream 2, the Russian Embassy recalled that the amounts of gas Russia sells to Europe are determined, first and foremost, by the needs of European buyers. “So the disruption of the project will not reduce the sales of Russian gas, but only redirect hydrocarbon flows along other routes. This, apparently, is Warsaw’s real goal,” it suggested, recalling Poland’s interest in preserving the flow of gas through existing pipeline infrastructure running through its territory, which allows Warsaw to earn money via transit fees.
Last week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken reiterated that “any entity” involved in Nord Stream 2 “risks US sanctions and should immediately abandon work on the pipeline”. Also last week, German media reported that EU nations and Germany in particular were growing increasingly disconcerted about Washington’s unilateralism and threats against Nord Stream 2.
Nord Stream 2 is already about 95 percent complete, and when finished, will enable Russia to provide Western Europe with an additional 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year, doubling the capacity of the existing Nord Stream network. Along with Russia’s Gazprom, the $10.5 billion project has received funding from Germany’s Uniper and Wintershall, France’s Engie, Austria’s OMV and the Anglo-Dutch concern Royal Dutch Shell.