05:42 GMT +320 August 2018
Listen Live
    Barents Sea view

    Six Reasons Why Norway's Arctic Oil Adventure Gets Put on Ice

    © Sputnik / Ilya Timin
    Business
    Get short URL
    Oil in Turmoil (132)
    0 140

    For a long time, Norway, Western Europe's largest exporter of oil and gas, has pinned its hopes on the northernmost part of the continental shelf. However, there are several reasons why large-scale production in the Arctic is mostly a pipe dream.

    Although Norway's continental shelf has been hailed as "the new oil province" and "the new Stavanger" (alluding to the country's breakthrough on the energy market in the 60s), optimism regarding new jobs and revenues has waned markedly in recent years.

    According to journalist Erik Lieungh at Norwegian national broadcaster NRK, there is ample explanation for the dwindling hopefulness.

    1. Electric cars

    However odd and far-fetched it may seem at first glance, the cost of electrification within transportation has fallen considerably. The bubbling interest in electric vehicles has had a detrimental effect on investments in the oil industry.

    Another reason is China's increased focus on electric vehicles as a step to improve air quality and get cleaner cities. This emphasis, which is expected to put China into the driver's seat of the electric car market, may prove crucial for the fossil fuel industry as well, as Asia is expected to account for over 70 percent of the world's oil and gas imports by 2040.

    2. Uncertainty and lack of incentive

    At present, no one in the oil industry has an appetite for any major developments. The simple reason is the uncertainty about how much revenue one can expect for the money invested, oil analyst Torbjørn Kjus at DNB Markets explained.

    According to Kjus, the entire industry is hesitant of exactly how much oil will be needed in the future. There are few who would eagerly wait for a decade or so to see the first return on their investments, Kjus ventured, suggesting a maximum waiting period of three years.

    3. Sparse infrastructure

    Infrastructure, on which the future oil development is dependent, is crucial to even think of possible investments, especially in the Arctic with its harsh conditions and environmental risks.

    Kjus noted the Johan Sverdrup oil field 160 kilometers west of Stavanger, southern Norway, which was discovered in 2010. The infrastructure was already in place from the previous exploration, and immediately made the oil field one of the country's most important industrial projects of the next 50 years.

    The Johan Sverdrup oil field is one of Norway's five largest, with expected resources of up to 3 billion barrels. No corresponding findings have been made in the Norwegian part of the Barents Sea.

    ​4. Fierce competitors

    US shale oil production is currently considered to be a rather flexible alternative, especially if oil prices rise. According to the International Energy Agency, the growth in US shale oil and gas production may be the most impressive ever delivered.

    This is especially challenging for OPEC countries that would like to gain more control over the prices and the markets themselves. Although Norway is not an OPEC member, it benefits greatly from the organization's push for higher oil prices. At present, however, the market is dominated by cheap oil from the Middle East, Thina Saltvedt, chief analyst at Nordea markets, pointed out.

    5. Lower prices

    Figures from Rystad Energy indicate that oil companies managed to reduce prices for new development by 16 percent after the oil crisis.

    The Johan Castberg field, touted as the next big thing in the upper part of the Norwegian Sea with recoverable reserves estimated at up to 650 million barrels, has reduced prices for supplies and equipment to as low as possible in its bid to achieve a price-effective solution that includes a floating production unit.

    ​According to Saltvedt, previous investments are of the main reasons why the project is being implemented. In new projects, however, elevated risks amid recession may scare off investors.

    6. Few finds

    Although the common attitude is that more discoveries may unleash a sort of a domino effect, so far the exploration in the Norwegian part of the Barents Sea has yielded unsatisfactory results. So far, just under 150 wells have been drilled in the Barents Sea, as opposed to 1,800 in the North Sea.

    This summer's exploration has been assessed as "disappointing" as, for instance, Statoil only managed to map out small gas deposits as part of the well-known Korpfjell field.

    Topic:
    Oil in Turmoil (132)

    Related:

    Norway’s $1-Trillion Wealth Fund Seeks to Lower Exposure to Oil, Gas
    Slices of Norway's 'Oil Pie' Being Cut Ever Thinner By More Migrants
    Claw of Contention: Norway, EU at Loggerheads Over Snow Crabs, Future Oil
    Absurdly Wealthy: Oil-Rich Norway's Piggy Bank Surpasses $1 Trillion Landmark
    Norway's Klondike: From Oil Capital to Unemployment Capital
    Tags:
    oil and gas, Arctic exploration, energy, Scandinavia, Norway, Barents Sea
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment