01:21 GMT +309 December 2019
Listen Live
    An employee at the Kaspersky Lab office in Moscow

    US vs Kaspersky: Politically-Charged 'Wholesale Attack' on Russian Businesses

    © Sputnik / Vladimir Astapkovich
    Get short URL

    The US decision to stop using Kaspersky software is an attempt to squeeze a successful Russian company out of the cybersecurity market, meaning that free competition makes sense to Americans only when it serves their interests, political analysts told Radio Sputnik.

    The US Homeland Security Department's decision to ban the use of Kaspersky Lab software on the pretext of engagement in cyber espionage could actually be the start of a "wholesale attack" on Russian businesses abroad, the head of the State Duma’s Committee on Information Policy, IT Technologies and Communications Leonid Levin told Sputnik.

    He described the US move as part of an economic war being waged against Russian companies.

    “This whole story with Kaspersky smacks of an attempt to get rid of an efficient and competitive company working in the field of cybersecurity,” Levin added.

    Vladimir Bruter, an expert with the International Institute of Humanitarian and Political Studies, told Sputnik  that “if some officials in Russia said that Apple and Microsoft were working hand in glove with the CIA and, therefore, their products were considered a security threat and should be outlawed, they would immediately be branded in America as the main enemies of democracy.”

    He added that for Americans democracy, just like free competition, makes sense only when it serves their interests and if it doesn’t, they resort to all kinds of bans.

    “I think that Russian [companies] should wake up to reality and start including a possible loss of the US market in their business plans,” Bruter added.

    Meanwhile, Kaspersky Lab’s CEO Yevgeny Kaspersky has accepted an invitation to testify in US Congress to address accusations that his company may be engaged in espionage.

    Expert in cybersecurity Andrei Masalovich told Radio Sputnik that Kaspersky’s testimony in Congress would be good PR both for him and his company.

    “Kaspersky Lab has come under a politically-charged attack simply because it is Russian. Moreover, this is a clear case of unfair competition at its worst. My suspicion is that this is a kind of attack every Russian company that is competitive in the world market may now come under,” Masalovich warned.

    Kaspersky Lab said in a statement that it has no inappropriate ties with any government, and was disappointed with the DHS decision.

    On Wednesday, the US Department of Homeland Security ordered all of the country’s federal departments and agencies to discontinue the use of Kaspersky Lab products over fears that the firm could have ties to state-sponsored spying programs.

    The company denied the allegations.

    Washington's recent attacks on Kaspersky Lab is seen by Moscow as an attempt to undermine efforts to rebuild a working relationship to combat terrorism and to initiate unfair competition in the information field and software market.


    Kaspersky Products Ban Reveals Drive to Demonize Russia - NSA Whistleblower
    Kremlin Considers Kaspersky Lab Discrimination in US to Be 'Unfair Competition'
    unfair competition, cybersecurity firm, software, ban, Microsoft, Apple, Russian State Duma, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), US Congress, Kaspersky Lab, Leonid Levin, Vladimir Bruter, Evgeny Kaspersky, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik