Apple of Discord: Trump's Comments on US Plants Render Investors Sceptical

© AP Photo / Mark LennihanApple logo
Apple logo - Sputnik International
Subscribe
Donald Trump said Apple Inc. would soon build “three big beautiful plants” to make iPhones and other products in the US, which might help the US economy, and also render the price tag on Apple products a bit steeper.

Apple Inc logo - Sputnik International
Asia
Apple Reportedly Working on Electric Car Batteries With Chinese Battery Maker
Kristian Rouz – On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump said that Apple Inc. CEO Tim Cook vowed to build three manufacturing facilities in the US, bringing the hi-tech manufacturing jobs back into the country, and thus contributing to the White House-targeted narrowing of the US foreign trade deficit.

Market participants reacted with a touch of scepticism to the remarks, pointing out the higher production and workforce costs in the US would render Apple products even less affordable for the average consumer.

This, in turn, might affect Apple’s earnings and profitability, and hinder their corporate growth prospects, which the company is hardly willing to tolerate. Therefore, some observers pointed out, Apple would not risk opening costly manufacturing facilities in the US, rather sticking to their existing, and quite successful, business model.

"I said, you know, Tim, unless you start building your plants in this country, I won't consider my administration an economic success," Trump said in his interview with the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday. "He called me, and he said they are going forward."

iPhone - Sputnik International
Smile for the Camera: Apple Wants Next iPhone to 3D-Scan Your Face
The Trump administration has enough leverage to affect Apple’s decision-making on the matter, which means a perspective of the tech corporation actually opening factories in the US should not be completely dismissed.

Aside of the Trump-proposed higher customs tariffs, or border adjustment tax, on goods imported from Asia, and mainland China, in particular, Apple might be facing other regulative measures unless they – at least, partially – comply with the White House’s aspirations to restore the US manufacturing.

"I spoke to [Cook], he’s promised me three big plants – big, big, big," Trump said.

This is not the first time Trump has mentioned Apple in his public speech. In January, Trump said that Apple were ‘open’ to opening some manufacturing facilities in the US. On his election campaign trail last year, Trump also said that, once elected, he would "get Apple to build their damn computers and things in this country instead of other countries."

Winners of the 2017 iPhone Photography Awards Announced - Sputnik International
Winners of the 2017 iPhone Photography Awards Announced
Apple’s current business model is heavily reliant on outsourcing and contracting other companies to do manufacturing, whilst the corporation itself is focusing primarily on research and development (R&D) in the United States. Apple does have some manufacturing in Ireland, and it also has some MacPro production in Texas, outsourced to Flex, a tech company that offers “sketch-to-scale intelligent products”.

However, the making of most of Apple’s products is outsourced to manufacturers such as Foxconn, with assembly lines in mainland China. These iPhones, iPads, and whatnot are then distributed throughout the world, and currently, they are entering the US market with little or none customs tariffs imposed, meaning the Chinese manufacturers are extracting significant benefits from the US consumer market.

Yet, some Apple displays for iPhone and iPad are made in Kentucky by Coring, whilst their processors are made by Samsung in New York and Texas.

Trump, however, wants a full production cycle moved to the US, because mass production assembly line creates most jobs in manufacturing, whereas the current scale of US-based electronics manufacturing is limited to only the production of most sophisticated components, which few workers are qualified enough to do.

Soon after winning the election in November, Trump said in a New York Times interview that he would "get Apple to build a big plant in the United States, or many big plants."

Apple logo - Sputnik International
Asia
Apple Taxes Content Creator Tips, Enraging Chinese Users
At this point, the iPhone production alone involves hundreds of thousands of workers in mainland China, whilst in the US, Apple has a total of 80,000 workers, and most of them are employees at the company’s retail locations.

Trump, however, has not made it clear whether he is expecting Apple itself to launch full-cycle electronics production in the US, or he would be satisfied with Apple’s subsidiaries moving their manufacturing facilities into the country. The former solution would maximise the positive effects to the US manufacturing and economy, as Apple would presumably pay more in taxes in the US, whilst the latter would involve international companies opening manufacturing facilities in the US, whilst being based elsewhere.

Foxconn, the Taipei-based manufacturer that operated multiple manufacturing locations in China, are allegedly in the process building factories in the US, in Michigan and Wisconsin, with some  Apple products expected to be made there. However, this is perhaps not the scale of reshoring of the US manufacturing Trump is expecting.

All in all, a US-made iPhones would not necessarily be more expensive than what they are now, as higher labour and regulation costs might be somewhat offset by the lower logistical expenses, especially in the event of full-cycle production opening in the US. Apple, at the same time, would enjoy a lower exposure to international economic and political risks and possible disruptions.

On the other hand, the tepid consumer sentiment in the US, and the still possible increases in iPhone retail price, as well as possibly lower manufacturer premium, could affect Apple’s financial performance.  Thus far, Apple’s stock responded positively to Trump’s announcement, with investors either anticipating Apple’s greater operational stability if US plants open, or completely dismissing Trump’s rhetoric.

In the latter case, however, Trump’s looming border-adjustment tax would produce significant volatility and plunge in earnings for Apple in the medium-term perspective.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала