21:36 GMT +322 April 2018
Listen Live
    US President Donald Trump walks from Marine One upon his return to the White House in Washington, US, April 9, 2017.

    American Metal: Trump Might Restrict Steel Imports to Help the 'Rust Belt'

    © REUTERS / Joshua Roberts
    Business
    Get short URL
    0 56

    In his effort to bring market-sustainable blue-collar jobs back in the US, President Donald Trump intends to restrict imports of steel, a politically wise, but economically questionable move.

    Kristian Rouz — In line with his "Buy American, Hire American" paradigm, US President Donald Trump will on Thursday sign a request for a streamlined investigation of whether or not the importation of foreign-produced steel is hurting the US economic and the country's strategic interests. One of Trump's electoral promises was to bring working class US jobs back, and once-thriving and now mired in desolation Pennsylvania, for example, voted for Trump on the strength of this pledge.

    Trump's political objective is obviously to deliver on his electoral campaign promises, and the imports of cheaper foreign steel might indeed be a factor contributing to the carnage in US steel jobs, industrial sector wage stagnation and lower quality of life in what is known as the "Rust Belt". The "Rust Belt" region, stretching from Pennsylvania in the east to Michigan to Wisconsin in the north-west, overwhelmingly voted for Trump mainly because the blue-collar Americans wan higher standards of living, whilst doing what they do — producing steel, for example.

    Will the economic reality support Trump's intention to make the American steel great again?

    Trump is going to sign a memorandum on section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 whilst meeting with heads of some US steel-producing companies on Thursday. A likely consequence would be imposing restrictions on steel imports for the reasons of national security. In other words, for many overseas steel exporters that would mean a de-facto US steel embargo.

    Such a move would push the steel prices higher in the US market, driving input prices for US car and machine parts production, among other industries, and, of course, construction. Now, whilst steel workers will indirectly benefit from the restrictions in steel imports, would the weak US economic growth support higher factory input prices, allowing for the US manufacturing to remain sustainable?

    Factory output prices, from pipelines to cars to electric furnace to shipbuilding, as well as construction costs will increase as one consequence. American-made goods, such as industrial machinery and military vessels and armor-plated vehicles, will increase in price. In order to remain competitive in the international market — unless domestic consumption picks up gradually, which it won't anytime soon — the US will have to devalue the dollar. There is hardly a way around it before the Trump-proposed fiscal stimulus plan kicks in driving a robust domestic expansion, which is unlikely till mid-2018 for political reasons.

    "Buy American" provisions "are vital to the health of the domestic steel industry, and have helped create manufacturing jobs and build American infrastructure," Thomas Gibson of the American Iron and Steel Institute, a Washington interest group, said.

    As for the more immediate consequences of the steel imports restrictions, US steel worker unions will rejoice. Given the high prominence of the unions in ‘Rust Belt' machine politics, support from the unions will provide Trump with sustainable grounds for re-election in 2020.

    For the economic viewpoint, however, a decision to cut steel imports is very controversial to say the least. US inflation will inevitably accelerate because the gains in factory input and output costs will drive factory-gate inflation. Yet, given the weakening US domestic demand, tightening credit conditions and overall slow growth, only a substantial spike in inflation could allow the US to dodge a cyclical recession in the coming two-three quarters.

    Some sort of government stimulus is necessary to offset the negative effects, be that deregulation, tax cuts, or increases in direct budget investment. However, all these measures might take longer to implement.

    "Trump has just created more risk for anyone who wants to import steel," steel industry researcher Michelle Applebaum said. "If he puts money behind enforcement, that will force people to play by the rules and that will be a good thing."

    The US imported approximately 30mln tons of steel in 2016 compared to 35mln the previous year. Its main overseas steel suppliers are Canada, Brazil, South Korea, Mexico, Japan and Germany. Mainland China and Russia, two of the world's biggest steel exporters, do not rank very high in this list. The United States produced 87.9mln tons of its own steel in 2016, down 0.5pc from 88.4mln tons the previous year.

    Among the White House guests invited for the discussion of the state of affairs in the steel industry on Thursday are Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and representatives from ArcelorMittal, Nucor, US Steel, AK Steel and Timken.

    Related:

    How Trump's Proposed Deregulation Could Make or Break the US Economy
    Stagflation Before Lift-off: US Economy Weakens Ahead of Trump’s Fiscal Package
    Mechanics of 'Trump Bump': Wall Street Outpaces Real Economy
    Trump's Plan for US Economic Protectionism Could Lead to EU Opposition
    Tags:
    metal, steel, Donald Trump, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment