07:55 GMT +330 March 2017
Live
    US flag

    Will Rising US Economic Confidence Translate Into Quicker Growth?

    © Photo: Pixabay
    Business
    Get short URL
    2225153

    In recent months, levels of economic optimism in the US have increased due to the new President’s promises to revitalise the productive forces and manufacturing capacity of the nation, but the economic reality is still akin to the Obama years of slow and inefficient expansion.

    Kristian Rouz – With US economic confidence having picked up in recent months, and the rebound in corporate earnings and consumer sentiment, real GDP growth is likely still subdued in the outgoing quarter, and the projections for the current year are still very modest.

    The ‘Trump effect’ to the economy, which has encouraged stock investors and US manufacturing and infrastructure sectors, has yet to produce a more sustainable growth from the broader economy, and decisive policy measures ensuring economic acceleration have yet to be undertaken.

    The US economy is still living in the Obama reality of slowing growth, low labor productivity and excessive regulation, hampering business activity and the creation of market-sustainable jobs. Financial market participants have been overly optimistic ever since Donald Trump was elected into office in November, but the non-financial sector is still struggling.

    The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta published its 1Q17 GDPNow growth projection, and is expecting an expansion of 0.9pc the current quarter, the worst since the Great Recession. Inventory investment in the US economy is still demonstrating downward dynamics, contributing some —0.79pc to the annualized season-adjusted GDP. This means that private sector stockpiles are still failing to convert into positive growth.

    Besides, growth in real personal consumption spending dropped from 2.1pc to 1.8pc, and expansion in non-residential equipment investment slowed from 9.1pc to 7.3pc.

    That said, US businesses are mostly still awaiting the Trump-proposed fiscal stimulus package, with tax cuts and infrastructure investment, as well the border tax adjustment, which are all expected to spur business investment and overall wealth generation.

    The ‘Trump effect’ has so far been mostly psychological, driving consumer spending only partially, whilst also encouraging wealth managers and equity investors, who are expecting a greater influx of capital in the near future.

    "I view Trump as a tech stock," Claus te Wildt of Fidelity Investments said. "He could fly high, or he could be a train wreck. We don’t know yet which … Normally, presidents don’t matter much (to the economy), but I think this one could be consequential."

    US domestic consumption, driving some 70pc of the economy, has demonstrated an uptick in consumer confidence, as higher Federal Reserve interest rates and, consequently, the rising costs of credit, driving home buying and large-budget purchases, such as cars.

    "Consumers are feeling better, especially about home values; housing valuations are at a decade’s high," Stephanie Link of TIAA Investments said.
    However, as outlined above, the broader consumer sector is affected by gains in inflation and stagnant wages, and US households are mostly struggling to fork out the money for unnecessary purchases.

    In manufacturing, which contributes some 12pc to the US GDP, no substantial increase in investment has been recorded yet. According to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, the manufacturing activity index dropped to 32.8 in March compared to 43.3 the previous month. Nonetheless, new orders reached their highest since 1987, reflecting increased investor confidence in US productive forces.

    Factory input costs also increased in March to their highest since 2011, and output prices posted an uptick as well, suggesting the broader US inflation measure is firming.

    "The reports painted a mostly upbeat picture of the economy," Daniel Silver of the New York-based bank JPMorgan said.

    All these positive consequences of the ‘Trump factor‘ will likely push US growth higher closer to the end of the year. Still, business investment, the key factor contributing to the expansion in the Main Street economy, will remain mostly subdued until after the Trump administration unveils their stimulus measures, which will likely take effect no earlier than early next year.

    "Even if a bump in the economic data does arrive, it may not last, unless the Trump administration advances policies that enhance longer-term productivity, through, for example, education reform, apprenticeship programmes, skills training, and labour retooling," Mohamed El-Erian of Allianz and formerly of the Obama administration wrote.

    The most acute issues that the Trump administration faces are the ability of the White House to actually enforce their agenda, and the immediate effects of their immigration policy. With stiff resistance from the left of the US political spectrum, as evidenced by the recent ‘travel ban’ turmoil and efforts to repeal Obamacare, Trump’s capability to force his economic agenda might be limited by the obstruction of Congressional Democrats, for example.

    With immigration, however, the issue is multi-dimensional. Whilst the anticipated ‘mass deportations’ could contribute to a liftoff in wages and labour productivity, severe workforce shortages, already visible in certain sectors of the economy, will require a new immigration policy in order to stave off the idling of industrial furnace, for instance.

    Massive tax cuts, on their part, will benefit all participants of the economy, allowing consumers to spend more, businesses to invest and reinvest more, and manufacturers to hire more workers and produce more goods.

    Yet, as of now, Trump mostly only looks good and promising, and most of the current year the economy will be driven by improved sentiment, which is based on the trust in his administration. The current 10-year economic cycle is nearing its end sometime in 2018-2019, and the threat of a new recession, albeit delayed, is still not off the table. Therefore, more decisive economic action is required as soon as the White House can pull itself together, or else it might turn out to be too late, to the utter satisfaction of Trump’s political opponents.

    Related:

    German Economy Minister Threatens US With Lawsuit Over Car Import Taxes
    US Federal Reserve: Global Economy Doing Better, Growing ‘Bit More Strongly’
    Troubled Liftoff: Improvements in US Economy Marred by Sector Discrepancies
    Number of US Citizens Perceiving Economy as Main Issue Lowest Since 2007
    Tags:
    economy, Donald Trump, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • avatar
      BobbyMyseh
      if regulation is stifling to economic activity and growth, why then is the US marijuana industry booming? The US "legal" marijuana industry is one of the most highly regulated industries in the world. Yet it continues to outpace most all other industries, in terms of real growth.

      And while I'm certainly no fan, or defender of D'Ohbama....but Sputnik (and state-controlled Russian news) definitely is chock full of propaganda.

      Let us not forget that the Great Recession began, and greatly escalated, under the Republican leadership of George Bush. It was generally under-regulated & self-regulated financial industries that caused the crash in the first place. Remember the out-of-control sub-prime lending trend?

      The book "Democracy and Political Ignorance" by Ilya Somin highlights how vastly ignorant the mass public truly is, and this seemingly applies similarly to Russian "Journalists" as well. People tend to forget true timelines, and falsely assign blame based on their vast ignorance (or complete disregard) of facts.
      This "article" is just another example of the massive Russian propaganda campaign, designed to try to shore up support for a highly unpopular Trump. The Russian government really wants people to accept Trump.

      D'Ohbama inherited the problem from his predecessor. True, the economy has proceeded at a snails pace under D'Ohbama, but he can hardly be blamed, via "over-regulation". If Democrat over-regulation is the cause of American economic stagnation, why did the economy crash under Bush (during a period of under-regulated sub-prime lending)?

      A rising stock market, that outpacing true productivity and profits, is not a sign economic health....in contrast, it's a sign of problems. As the stock market is composed of over 66% attitude, rather than real value, a rising perceived value, absent any real economic growth, is a sign of potential problems. The stock market is all about taking from others. The only way people win in a stock market like we're seeing now, is by profiting off others losses. A stock market that outpaces real economic activity, attracts more investors looking to make a quick profit, and large bubbles always precede pops.

      The statement "The US economy is still living in the Obama reality of slowing growth, low labor productivity and excessive regulation, hampering business activity and the creation of market-sustainable jobs." is therefore totally without merit....just more pro-Trump Russian misinformation based on faulty logic (or total propaganda).
    Show new comments (0)