22:35 GMT +313 November 2019
Listen Live
    US and Ukrainian notes and coins

    Long-Term Downside Effects of QE Push Economic ‘Normality' Out of Sight

    © Sputnik / Alexandr Demyanchuk
    Get short URL
    0 44

    The downsides of unconventional monetary policies have become increasingly prominent recently amid low commodity prices, financial market volatility and disruptive international trade, resulting in an almost inevitable redundancy of the economic "normality" concept.

    Kristian Rouz — As yields on Treasury bonds are sinking due to the investors' rush for safety and lack of sustainably upbeat growth, the Federal Reserve's main concern at least till the end of the year is maintaining the economic environment in its current shape rather than making policy moves towards a noticeable return to "normality."

    Base interest rates are bound to remain at their current rather low level, moreover, should recessional dynamics prevail, the regulator might loosen monetary conditions again, or implement other non-conventional policies such as "helicopter money." All that said, as the economy fails to demonstrate convincingly high growth rates, adequate levels of core prices gains and positive dynamics in salaries and wages, the return to the economics of "normality,"  as we have known it throughout most of the past century, is unlikely any time soon.

    President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Dennis Lockhart commented on the current and potentially upcoming regulative measures, having said that reverse correlation between inflation and unemployment is unlikely to be seen in the US economy in the medium-term. A feature of a "normal" economy, interrupted by the aggressive monetary stimulus ("quantitative easing") recently, such a correlation is hard, if possible, to restore; at this point unemployment is low, yet, inflation is subdued as well, paradoxically failing to gain momentum.

    "We are clearly in a different economic period of history, economic environment… This yearning that you so often hear about and read about for a return to normal is probably a really false objective," Lockhart told Reuters. "I can envision for a number of years a lower potential growth rate… That means the appropriate interest rate remains in a low range."

    High rates of gainful employment are failing to spur gains in core prices index and, subsequently, broader growth and there might be two ways to explain such a phenomenon. First, the persistent stickiness in wages prevents consumers from shopping, even though they have a job — it pays only enough to cover their urgent needs, like food, fuel, debt servicing, etc, yet not enough to afford extra purchases. Second, the Labor Department statistics have stirred a lot of controversy recently, rendering many observers wondering whether consumers do indeed have jobs. The popularity of ShadowStats and Donald Trump, both claiming the actual unemployment stands at 20-30 percent level rather than the officially claimed 5 percent, might provide certain clues.

    The Fed are focused on their very cautious "data-dependent" approach to policy, aimed at avoiding negative policy spillovers rather than bringing the economy back in its pre-Great Recession shape. However, no recession-averse policy can prevent cyclical dynamics in the economy, and a recession as such will eventually happen, the question is, when.  With US stocks having recently posted record highs, and an expected robust growth in the second quarter, as inferred from Friday's retail data and massive downturn might entail this period of encouragement.

    "Ironically, one can think of a scenario where a stronger-than-expected expansion leads to financial trouble, which in turn puts into question the expansion itself," said ex-International Monetary Fund (IMF) chief economist Olivier Blanchard told the WSJ.

    Blanchard emphasized the trouble stemming from the discrepancy between the massive gains in the stock market and a very modest expansion in the real economy recently.

    "You have to anticipate," he also said. "If I was at the Fed, I would be slightly on the hawkish side."

    A Fed hike in rates indeed might have come in handy at the moment, as it could slash the speculative gains in stocks, bringing the stock market's valuation more in line with the actual economic expansion. Meanwhile, the abundance of money liquidity in the US and across the globe could absorb the shocks of a rate hike.

    "It has been a surge in net global central bank asset purchases to their highest level since 2013," Matt King of Citibank said.

    Nonetheless, the Fed are bound to remain recession-averse and extremely dovish in the near-to-mid-term, meaning the spillovers of the ultra-loose monetary conditions will mount to a toxic point of severe disinvestment in the real economy, coupled with abundant business inventories and a super-charged stock market, potentially leading to a sort of a combination of a classic overproduction crisis and a financial panic, similar to the 1929 scenario.


    Pump It Up: Downward Pressure on Oil Mounts as OPEC Increases Production
    Gaelic Tiger Roars Back: Ireland’s Economy Skyrockets 26% in 2015
    Hopes for Brexit-Adjustment Reform Arise With May to Lead the UK Gov’t
    Fat Cats’ Crash Diet: 2Q16 Closes With Losses in Global Financials
    Crude Prices Poised to Spike as Norwegian Oil Industry Gears Up for Strike
    government bonds, monetary policy, Federal Reserve Bank
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik