Why US Does Not Need to Abandon Russian-Made RD-180 Engines

© AP Photo / Maxim MarmurEnergomash company employees stand near RD-180 engines prepared for shipment to the United States in a shop at the Energomash
Energomash company employees stand near RD-180 engines prepared for shipment to the United States in a shop at the Energomash - Sputnik International
Subscribe
American hawks, like Senator John McCain, are determined to put an end to a successful partnership that has seen Russia's reliable and powerful RD-180 engines propel US payloads to space on the Altas V rockets, but there is no need to follow their lead, Todd Harrison wrote for Defense One.

"There is no compelling reason to limit the number of RD-180 engines the military can use right now," he noted.

Earlier, Senate Armed Services Committee, chaired by McCain, released its version of the National Defense Authorization Act for the fiscal year 2017, urging to limit the number of RD-180 engines to nine. The House Armed Services Committee recommended increasing the number to 18.

"Rather than rushing to do something premature, Congress should keep as many options open as possible," Harrison observed. "Setting a hard limit on the number of RD-180 engines now effectively limits competition and could force a transition to alternative launch vehicles that may not be ready."

© Flickr / Official U.S. Navy PageAn Atlas V rocket launches the Navy's Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) 2 satellite from Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
An Atlas V rocket launches the Navy's Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) 2 satellite from Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station - Sputnik International
An Atlas V rocket launches the Navy's Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) 2 satellite from Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station

The US decided to find alternative ways to launch satellites into space following Crimea's reunification with Russia, a move approved by more than 96 percent of the peninsula's population. The US is currently exploring three options – it is developing a new engine and designing new launch vehicles, but this is a lengthy process that requires significant funding.

RD-180 rocket engine - Sputnik International
World
Abandonment of Russian Booster Engines May Send NASA's Costs Skyrocketing
Meanwhile, the US Air Force could launch satellites into space using a more expensive Delta IV rocket. This comes at a time when military spending is still limited by the caps introduced in 2011.

Harrison warned that new technology should be tested before the switch occurs since space launch is a risky business.

"Military satellites cost much more than the rockets that launch them – some cost over $1 billion each. Dropping one of these satellites in the ocean because of a failed launch would set the military back by years," he noted.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала