08:34 GMT +310 December 2019
Listen Live
    Protesters wearing Guy Fawkes masks attend an anti-government demonstration in Hong Kong, China, November 5, 2019

    Beijing: Hong Kong High Court Has No ‘Authority’ to Call Mask Ban Unconstitutional

    © REUTERS / Kim Kyung-Hoon
    Asia & Pacific
    Get short URL
    3132
    Subscribe

    Just hours after Hong Kong’s High Court ruled the city’s face mask ban unconstitutional, a spokesperson for the National People’s Congress (NPC) of China slammed the decision and voiced the disagreements of committee members belonging to the country’s top legislative affairs body.

    High Court Judges Anderson Chow and Godfrey Lam announced Monday that recent legislation which prohibited the wearing of face masks during demonstrations and associated gatherings was “incompatible with the Basic Law” - or de facto constitution - of Hong Kong.

    According to the justice officials, the prohibition introduced under the Emergency Regulations Ordinance infringed on the fundamental rights of Hongkongers.

    However, members of the NPC seem to disagree wholeheartedly that the High Court even had the authority to make such a decision.

    “Whether the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region comply with the Basic Law of Hong Kong can only be judged and decided by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress,” Yan Tanwei, spokesperson for the Legislative Affairs Commission of the Standing Committee of the NPC, said in a statement obtained by Reuters.

    “No other authority has the right to make judgments and decisions,” Yan added.

    Chinese state-run news agency Xinhua reported that Yang Guang, spokesman for the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council, “expressed serious concern” over the potential “negative social impact” of the court’s ruling.

    Despite their publicly voiced grievances and comments on Hong Kong’s Basic Law as it relates to the mask ban, the NPC has not moved to take action against the High Court ruling.

    Stuart Hargreaves, an associate professor at The Faculty of Law of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, argued that the comments made by the body could be viewed as a “shocking restriction on judicial autonomy” for the special administrative region.

    In recent days, the bulk of attention in regard to anti-government demonstrations has been centralized around Hong Kong Polytechnic University, where things recently escalated and anti-riot police threatened to use “live rounds” in retaliation to violent protesters held up in the besieged school.

    According to a Tuesday report from Hong Kong police, an estimated “800 people have left the campus … in a peaceful manner” since exits were shuttered and monitored. About 300 of those individuals are said to have been under the age of 18.

    Related:

    Why is the Media Covering Protests in Hong Kong, Chile So Differently?
    Beijing Moves to Strengthen ‘Bottom Line’ of Relationship with Hong Kong, Macau
    ‘Hard Core’ of Hong Kong Protesters Compensate for Dwindling Numbers With Increased Violence
    ‘Pretextual Discourse’: Western Media Ignores Rioting, Blames Hong Kong Police for Chaos
    Taiwan Evacuates Students From Hong Kong As Deadly Protest Clashes Continue
    Tags:
    China's Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, Chinese National People's Congress (NPC), National People's Congress, Beijing, Basic Law, China, Hong Kong
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik