13:06 GMT06 May 2021
Listen Live
    Asia & Pacific
    Get short URL

    Last April, the Delhi High Court in a historic verdict had said that certain items such as seeds, plants, and animals cannot be patented under Indian law.

    New Delhi (Sputnik) — In a major victory for the world’s largest genetically modified seed manufacturer Monsanto, India’s apex court reinstated its claim over patent of BT Cotton seed that it is presently selling in India.

    READ MORE: US Lawyers Have 'Explosive' Documents on Monsanto's Business in Europe

    ​The Supreme Court of India overruled the order pronounced by the Delhi High Court declaring the company's patent on its best-selling BT cotton seed variants, Bollgard and Bollgard-II, "invalid".

    The St. Louis-based company had lost the patent battle in the Delhi High Court on 11 April, two years after a case was filed by India's Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd (NSL), which argued that the US seed company was not eligible to claim patents and demanded royalties from Indian seed companies.

    The Delhi High Court had rejected Monsanto’s plea to stop Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd., an estranged licensee of the company, from selling BT cotton seeds in India. Monsanto challenged the decision in the country's apex court on 2 May 2018.

    READ MORE: No Relief for Monsanto Fighting Legal Battle for GM Cotton Patent in India

    After the Delhi High Court judgment, it was expected that the cotton seed price would come down heavily in India and provide relief to debt-ridden farmers as they have to take out loans to purchase the costly seeds and pesticides marketed by the US firm.


    Monsanto Cancels Plan to Launch Next Gen Cotton Seeds in India
    Loosening the Noose: India Bows to Pressure From Monsanto Over GM Cotton
    Monsanto Losing Ground: India Rethinks Rules Over Sale of GM Cotton Seeds
    Wrap-Up Time for Monsanto? India ‘Won’t Allow Exploitation of Farmers’
    Monsanto India to Boost Business Significantly: Reports
    court decision, monsanto, patent, Monsanto, India
    Community standardsDiscussion