Listen Live
    A Chinese national flag flutters in the wind in between a high-rise residential and office complex in Beijing, China. (File)

    Why Does China Need to Bankrupt Its Companies?

    © AP Photo / Andy Wong
    Asia & Pacific
    Get short URL
    151
    Subscribe

    According to Bloomberg, in 2018 the number of bonds defaults in China increased by 4 times compared with the previous year. Companies were not able to pay off bonds for 108.5 billion yuan ($15 billion).

    In November alone the courts heard as many bankruptcy cases as they sometimes get in a year. What is the reason behind such a wave of bankruptcies this year?

    READ MORE: Russia, China Can Ink Deal on National Currencies Payments by End of Year — Bank

    Bankruptcy law has existed in the PRC for over 10 years. However, until 2014 there were no corporate defaults on bonds. Shanghai Chaori Solar, a small solar panel manufacturer, was the first one. Out of the 89.9 million yuan in debt ($ 14.6 million), it was able to pay investors only 4 million yuan ($580,000), after which it began a bankruptcy procedure. In 2015, Chinese companies were unable to pay 8.2 billion yuan ($1.2 billion) to their debt security holders. By 2016, the debt had already reached 30 billion ($4.3 billion). For a couple of years, the figure was at a stable level and then suddenly there was a fourfold increase.

    A significant part of defaults is accounted for by so-called "zombie companies" — unprofitable enterprises, including state ones. Since the beginning of last year, the Chinese authorities have set their sights on struggling loss-making companies in order to clear bank balance sheets from problem loans by 2020. In March 2017, during a session of the National People's Congress, the President of the Supreme People's Court of China Zhou Qiang stated that it was necessary to improve bankruptcy procedures in the country's judicial system in order to meet the targets for reducing problem loans. It has been made clear to companies that the state will no longer keep them afloat artificially.

    To cope with the consequences of the 2008 crisis, the Chinese government decided to infuse 4 trillion yuan ($585 billion) into the economy, which at that time was 12.5% of the country's GDP. Most of these funds went to companies as loans through the banking system. As the state gave money, it also set the priorities for financing. Credits were given to companies for large-scale infrastructure projects. The selection criterion was simple: the more the project creates jobs, the better. During a crisis, this is really important. Profitability was the last thing on everyone's mind.

    As a result, a huge amount of excess production capacity appeared in heavy industry and in solar energy. However, companies were not allowed to go bankrupt as they were also creating jobs. Local authorities urged banks to refinance loans. A huge sector of "shadow banking" has emerged — non-banking structures that give out loans at higher interest rates to those who have been denied loans by state banks. By 2017, shadow banking accounted for 10 trillion of the 34 trillion dollars of the total debt of public and private companies in China. In the end, banks sometimes securitised debts and sold them as investment products in order to unload their balance sheets.

    All of that created risks for the country's financial system. The authorities were aware of this. The fight against systemic risks was prioritised at the last congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Therefore, it was decided to return bad debts to the balance sheets of banks, and allow unprofitable companies to go bankrupt so as not to accumulate bad loans as a snowball. This explains the sharp increase in the number of companies defaulting. Although the unfavourable foreign trade environment also played a role, Bian Yongzu, Research Fellow of Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, said in an interview with Sputnik:

    "The US-China trade war affected the supply chain: duties on products of many enterprises increased, which is reflected in operating activities. The increasing Fed rates creates problems of liquidity shortages in world markets, so companies that borrowed money abroad are faced with an increase in interest rates on their debts", the expert said.

    READ MORE: US China Trade War Impact: China Removes 7 Year Old Ban on Indian Livestock Feed

    In his opinion, this has also become a big problem. Yet this is not only a Chinese phenomenon, but the entire world economy is also now in a state of uncertainty. Time requires companies to change their business models and move to a new level to avoid problems.

    "On the one hand, a massive wave of defaults for creditors, of course, is bad. According to Bloomberg, an average of unsecured 'bad loans' can recover no more than 10-15% of the debt. On the other hand, it will improve the financial system. It will make loan products and decisions about providing them more market-oriented", Bian Yongzu noted.

    In such a case, financial structures will be able to direct resources to more promising companies, rather than being scattered on "zombies" who devour so much money. Moreover, it is dangerous for the entire financial sector.

    "Zombie companies compromise the profitability of the credit industry. As a result, financial structures change their credit policy under these conditions. But then getting credit is becoming difficult even for promising, normal companies".

    Therefore, in this case, a wave of bankruptcies, is a painful, but still necessary evolutionary process, the expert believes. Further movement towards the market implies an increase in the responsibility of economic entities for their capital. But the game is worth the risk. According to IMF's calculations, the elimination of zombie companies will bring China an additional 1.2 percent of GDP growth annually.

    The views and opinions expressed by the speakers do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    Related:

    Jaguar Land Rover Slashing 1000s of Jobs to Save Profits amid US-China Trade War
    China to WTO: US Tariffs 'Allow Protectionism to Be at Large'
    Co-opted Communism: China Firm Builds $1.7 Billion Workers’ Paradise Theme Park
    Tags:
    banks, bankruptcy, GDP, China
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik