03:59 GMT +315 December 2018
Listen Live
    Indian hotel staff pay tribute to victims seven years after a deadly terror attack killed and injured staff and guests in Mumbai on November 26, 2015. A total of 166 people were killed in November 2008 when Islamist gunmen stormed luxury hotels, the main railway station, a Jewish centre and other sites in the booming metropolis of Mumbai, the financial heart of India.

    American Hypocrisy at Play on 10th Anniversary of Mumbai Terror Attack

    © AFP 2018 / STR
    Asia & Pacific
    Get short URL
    370

    US citizen of Pakistan descent David Headley, despite pleading guilty of plotting the Mumbai terror attack, was not extradited to India as part of a plea bargain with the US administration in 2010. Indian security agencies were not allowed access to Headley for a second time, despite repeated requests.

    The US has announced a $5 million reward for information leading to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual who committed, conspired, aided or abetted the terror attacks in Mumbai, India on 26 November 2008. This is the second time that the US is announcing such reward, as the first such announcement did not yield any result.

    READ MORE: US Supplies More 'Missiles, Howitzers, Machine Guns' to SDF – Spokesman 

    "We call upon all countries, particularly Pakistan, to uphold their UN Security Council obligations to implement sanctions against the terrorists responsible for this atrocity, including Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and its affiliates," Mike Pompeo, US secretary of state, said.

    But why was David Headley, the American spy who allegedly hatched the conspiracy for the attacks, converted into an "Approver" by the US? This question continues to haunt the Indian security agencies, as the US has never explained to India in the last 10 years why it entered into a plea bargain with Headley in 2010 that helped him escape the death penalty. 

    The plea bargain said that he would not be extradited to India, Denmark (where he hatched terror conspiracy), or Pakistan for any offenses for which he has been convicted under the plea, including conspiracy to bomb places of public use in India.

    David Headley's plea bargain, according to India's intelligence officers who did not wish to be quoted, made the case weaker as "Indian intelligence only received such information, which was already out there in public domain."

    India's National Investigative Agency only once interacted with David Headley in 2010 to record his statement and that, too, 10 days after the Indian official landed in the US. Since then, Indian agencies were not able to catch hold of Headley until 2016, when he deposed before a Mumbai court through video conferencing from a US jail, but despite making attempts, the US authorities never disclosed the whereabouts of Headley.

    READ MORE: US Citizen Behind Mumbai Terror Acts Used False ID Under Islamists' Orders

    There has been a perception among certain section in the Indian administration that the US had every detail of Headley's movement and that is why the US administration never allowed Indian agencies to question him independently.

    Not getting access to Headley was one of the main reasons why the Indian agencies could not get answers to key questions inkling "who were the 'state actors' Headley was close to?"  

    It is believed that Headley visited Mumbai several times citing the reason as "for setting up of immigration office" but the key question that remains unanswered is — "how did the US citizen manage to sneak into India several times on false pretext?"

    Related:

    Three Men Arrested in Australia for Plotting Daesh-Inspired Terror Attack
    Mossad Reportedly Tipped Off Argentina About Alleged Hezbollah Terror Plot
    Police Urge Retailers & Shoppers to Help Counter Christmas Terror Threat in UK
    Man Arrested as Counter-Terror Police Find Two Explosive Devices in London Flat
    Tags:
    US hypocrisy, terror attack, investigation, anniversary, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Mike Pompeo, US, India, Mumbai
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik