Listen Live
    Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis., laugh as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses a joint meeting of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 8, 2016.

    US Nuclear Reactors to Prove White Elephant for India

    © AP Photo / Evan Vucci
    Asia & Pacific
    Get short URL
    11124

    India's latest move in the direction of implementing a nuclear energy pact with the US is gaining strong resentment as the US reactors are most likely to cost three times more than that of Russian reactors already well operational.

    The Indian government's commitment to expedite the formalities of a deal allowing America's Westinghouse Electric to set up six nuclear reactors in India is drawing flak for being commercially nonviable. The proposition was part of the talks between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Barack Obama during the former's latest visit to the US.

    Many are questioning the rationale behind such a commitment as installing nuclear reactors manufactured by Westinghouse would overshoot the cost of Russian reactors already in operation at Kudankulam of Tamil Nadu.

    Amit Bhandari, Energy Expert and India's leading think-tank Gateway House told Sputnik, "Considering the cost of a reactor that Westinghouse is building in the US, cost per megawatt works out to $7.5 million while the approved cost of Kudankulam Unit 3 & 4 is $2.9 million. So there seems a strong likelihood that the cost of Westinghouse reactors will exceed that of the Russian reactors in India." Russia's Rosatom operates two reactors at Kudankulam, in Tamil Nadu.

    Meanwhile, one of India's major political parties — the Communist Party of India (Marxist) — is also skeptical of the viability of projects involving western nuclear reactors. A CPI (M) statement says "The cost of the AP1000 reactors are going to be prohibitive, just as the French Areva reactors to be set up at Jaitapur (Maharashtra). By a conservative estimate, it is going to cost more than USD 42 billion for the six reactors. The cost of power produced from these reactors is going to be unsustainable."

    "Solar and wind energy are already cheaper than nuclear power in India — in this scenario, any new nuclear project has to be evaluated for its commercial viability, otherwise we risk ending up with a white elephant," says Amit Bhandari.

    In January 2016, Finland's Fortum Finnsurya offered to supply solar power at a record low price of Rs. 4.34/kWh in India. Apart from Fortum, several other bidders have offered to supply solar power at less than Rs. 5/kWh. The wind energy tariff in India, on the other hand, ranges from Rs. 4.13-Rs. 6.60/kWh, depending upon the location.

    India and Westinghouse haven't discussed commercial terms, including the price of reactors. Nonetheless, a joint statement released after the meeting between Indian Prime Minister & the US President Barack Obama states, "Both sides welcomed the announcement by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd, and Westinghouse that engineering and site design work will begin immediately and the two sides will work toward finalizing the contractual arrangements by June 2017."

    The reactors were originally planned to be built in Gujarat, but opposition by locals over land acquisition forced the authorities to relocate the project to Srikakulam in Andhra Pradesh. However, resentment is high among locals in Srikakulam as well. Farmers have threatened to protest if their demands for a higher compensation are not met. 

     

    Related:

    Switzerland Backs India for Nuclear Supplier Group Membership
    China Denies Blocking India’s Admission to Nuclear Suppliers Group
    India Successfully Tests Nuclear-Capable Prithvi II Missile
    Tags:
    nuclear, Rosatom, Narendra Modi, India, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik