01:58 GMT +324 January 2017
Live
    This photo taken on May 10, 2016 shows crew members of China's South Sea Fleet taking part in a logistics supply drill near the James Shoal area on South China Sea

    ‘US Playing With Fire by Repeatedly Poking China in the Eye’ in S China Sea

    © AFP 2016/ STR
    Asia & Pacific
    Get short URL
    104362551

    In an imagined letter, Ms. Oh Beigong from Taipei addressed the big bosses of the US military and naval forces, pointing out sharply that the US cannot stop flexing its muscles in the South China Sea and has wrongly fabricated accusations against China.

    The letter was addressed to Admiral Harry B. Harris, Commander of the United States Pacific Command, and copied to his bosses, US Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus and US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, as well as Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

    The letter was published by Leslie Fong, former editor at the Straits Times, who said that Ms. Oh Beigong (Oh be gone?) found its way to his inbox. Some fragments of her letter are presented below.

    “Dear Admiral Harris,

    I write to congratulate you for standing up for mariners the world over to assert the right to freedom of navigation in international waters. You showed much daring when on May 10, you sent the USS William P. Lawrence, an Arleigh Burke class missile destroyer, to within 12 nautical miles of Fiery Cross Reef, over which Beijing has long claimed sovereignty and which it has occupied for years,” online publication reported Ms. Oh as saying. Fiery Cross Reef is also claimed by the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam.

    She also wrote that one didn't need guts, or even brains, to dispatch the destroyer, as they were just carrying out the orders of their political masters. But she thinks the admiral needs more credit for risking the lives of his sailors as he couldn't know for sure that the Chinese would steer clear of the US destroyer.

    Ms. Oh further mentioned how back in the 80’s during the Cold War period, Soviet frigates “bumped” American naval craft in the Black Sea for intruding into waters which they considered their own. Lately, Chinese commentators have been publicly talking about imitating the Soviets.

    She pointed out that according to her the US is really pushing its luck and playing with fire.

    “Let me get serious. The US is playing with fire by repeatedly poking China in the eye. We in this region are going to be the collateral damage if this spins out of control. And why should we pay the price when the US does not really have right on its side? As a thinking man, did you not feel discomfort deep inside you when the US kept singling out the Chinese as the bad guys in the maritime disputes?” China Daily reported.

    “You must know better than most on this planet that the US has not been able to cite one instance when China actually denied anyone the freedom of navigation or point to any statement by Beijing threatening that right.”

    She further mentioned the expansionism that the US has been involved in for years and how it is the US that has 11 carrier battle groups circling the globe, each with enough firepower to send four-fifths of the world’s countries “back to Stone Age.”

    “You will say, no doubt, that the Chinese are going to militarize the airstrips and other facilities to project force, thus threatening all the countries in the region. Er, coming from a senior naval officer of a country that operates some 800 bases or military facilities in more than 60 countries around the world, several of them virtually at China's doorstep, that, sir, is a bit rich!”

    She then cleverly pointed out that the US is not in the habit of admitting that it is or can be wrong. She brought up a few examples of instances when the US refused to take the blame for its actions.

    “Bottom line? Might is right. The US is out to stymie the rise of China and prevent it from challenging American dominance, if not hegemony. We get that. So do us a favor, please stop talking about high principles and international law.”

    She then went on to advise what Admiral Harry B. Harris could personally do in order to regain at least a little bit respect from clear-sighted people who cannot be fooled.

    “In the name of asserting freedom of navigation and upholding international law, send your destroyer or whatever to an atoll in the Philippine Sea which the Japanese call Okinotorishima (Okinotori Island) and claim as their territory. The atoll measures no more than 9 sq m at low tide, which is probably smaller than your office in Honolulu, and lies more than 1,700km south of Tokyo. But it is less than 500km from Taiwan itself.”

    She explained that under Unclos, an atoll is not an island so it cannot be used as the basis to use the usual 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone or EEZ. But that has not stopped Tokyo from doing so, and it has proclaimed as its EEZ an area larger than the entire Japan.

    Taiwan is one of the many that have refused to recognize this. “So, please, dear admiral, send the William P. Lawrence there and have some of its crew go fishing near the atoll. All who look askance at your dubious freedom of navigation expeditions in the South China Sea thus far will applaud you.”

    She ended her letter with, “Don't let the Chinese beat you to it!”

    Earlier, Beijing responded to the call of United States Secretary of State John Kerry to restrict the creation of a national air defense zone in the South China Sea by urging the US and Japan to stop making baseless accusations against China.

    “We do not create problems, but are not afraid of trouble,” the deputy head of the General Staff of the People's Liberation Army of China, Sun Jianguo, was reported by Reuters as saying.

    “China has indisputable sovereignty over the Nansha Islands and the adjacent waters, which is fully backed by historical and legal evidence,” China Daily reported Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying as saying.

    The relevant construction which took place on China’s own territory violated no international law.

    Related:

    My Way or Highway: Beijing Issues Four ‘Bottom Lines’ on South China Sea
    Scared of the Rising Tiger? What’s Behind US Rhetoric Over South China Sea
    ‘Unsafe and Unprofessional’: Chinese Intercept US Jet Over South China Sea
    This is Why China is Deploying Surveillance Drones Over the South China Sea
    Peaceful Discourse the Only Solution to South China Sea Debacle
    Tags:
    disputed waters, open letter, destroyer, bilateral relations, Harry Harris, Ashton Carter, South China Sea
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
      I think it's called China Sea for a reason when the us or its vassals start arguing well the truth is on the other side.
    • cast235
      Little do the letter writer knows.
      NOT doing what is told, is dereliction of duties, losing the position and command INSTANTLY.
      he no hero no SUPER NOTHING. He a SLAVE. DO AS TOLD or else.
      he cannot even give opinion.or get SACKED at best.

      they probably wrote the letter themselves.

      Wait till China for a landing of an OBAMA'S PLANES. Or start hitting a ship or something. They've no idea what they doing. Listening to Mc Cain and other ..
      Carter, may NOT be completely agreeing internally, BUT IF he dare say ANYTHING, even slightly, he'll be at congress next few hours after opening the mouth. And could get SACKED and even arrested on bogus charges. Like you lied to congress. Or whatever they invent.
      Perhaps observation after such comments. Placing him under arrest indefinitely.
      World think U.S is all about FREEDOM. Yeah. TO DO WHAT YOU TOLD.
    • peaceactivist2
      Yes, China is growing to a greater nation with many advancing technologies, economy, and materials wealth that are enough to generate great anxiety and jealousy among many nations. All world leaders are in such positions but they are human, thinking like human, jealous like human, anger line human, and can be as evil as a gangster in urban streets. So, yes, some times those acts are intentionally devised up to poke some one without international sanction or rules or law. Fears are that China is growing more on economy and materials wealth sections that China may lack sufficient defending tools to prevent provoking actions from igniting real fire. Nowadays it appeared that wars are by no means to win but to destroy. And appeared lately on the many not so long passed in history time line that destroy by no means of just military sites but the entire cities and town. Few nations are back to Stone Age!
    • test
    • michael
      nicely done.
    • DavidG
      "an atoll in the Philippine Sea which the Japanese call Okinotorishima (Okinotori Island) and claim as their territory. The atoll measures no more than 9 sq m at low tide"

      Okinotori Island is the Japanese Coast Guard Office for collecting tribute or ransom money from Taiwanese fishermen. The Imperial govt. of Japan probably considers Taiwan to be a tributory vassal state of its Empire and reserves the right to collect tribute from vassal states.
    Show new comments (0)