14:40 GMT +320 October 2019
Listen Live
    An artist concept of a Russian lunar base

    Lunacy and Plutocracy: Russian Astronomer Rebukes Drive to Commercialize Space

    © Photo : Central Research Institute of Machine Building
    Life
    Get short URL
    4511
    Subscribe

    In an interview with Sputnik, Vladislav Shevchenko of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute at Moscow State University gave his thoughts on US Senator Ted Cruz's recent proposal to "commercialize" the 1967 Outer Space Treaty.

    Late last month, US Senator Ted Cruz called for "commercializing" the Outer Space Treaty which was signed in 1967 and has been ratified by 105 countries.

    According to Cruz, this document should be changed to accommodate the full-scale commercial exploitation of space, while at the same time continuing to fulfill its political function limiting the proliferation of weapons in outer space.

    Commenting on the matter, Vladislav Shevchenko of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute at Moscow State University recalled that "the elaboration of space law was originally associated with the development of the Moon, the construction of habitable bases there and the extraction of minerals."

    "Under the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, any cosmic body, including the Moon, cannot belong to any state or country; it remains common human property," Schevchenko said.

    He added that he always wondered why his American colleagues at the Johnson Space Center in Houston refused to bother creating a moon base, given the  great technical success of the US in single manned flights to the Moon.

    He said that for him, it was also unclear why Americans refuse to begin work developing lunar resources.

    "They answered by asking me to imagine the situation when they deliver to the Earth commercially significant quantities of valuable metals. Shortly after, representatives of a certain small state, which did not take part in the industrial development of the Moon but signed the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, emerge and start to require their share on totally legitimate grounds," Shevchenko said.

    In this regard, he referred to an interesting case in the late 1990s when US entrepreneur Gregory Nemitz decided to claim ownership of an asteroid, given the fact that the 1967 Outer Space Treaty includes a ban on the sole ownership of space objects by countries, nations and people rather than by individuals.

    "Nemitz said to me that he wanted to create a legal precedent and open the road to space for private capital for the common good. Shortly after, entrepreneurs of a different kind tried to capitalize on this loophole in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty," Shevchenko said, referring to "the firms that deal with selling plots on the Moon."

    When asked about whether the current space law leaves loopholes for swindlers, Svevchenko recalled attending a ceremony to award employees of a respectful company with moon land.

    He said that during the ceremony, he showed the employees their future lunar plots and briefed them on the cost of cobalt, nickel and other valuable metals to be extracted from their moon lands.

    "They were happy, and I advised them to start saving considerable amounts of money already," Shevchenko added.

    "They believed that they would need the money to transport their wealth from the moon. But I had to upset potentially lucky people and bring them back to harsh reality. I said that the money that they would have saved would have to be spent on lawyers so that they could prove these employees' legal rights to their lunar property," he concluded.

    Related:

    Private Space Stations to Orbit Moon by 2020?
    Private Space Race Heats Up, Moon Landing Expected in Late 2017
    European Space Chief Claims Moon Villages to Be Established ‘Rather Soon’
    First Russian Cosmonauts May Be Sent to Moon in 2031 – Space Corporation
    Tags:
    representatives, lawyers, treaty, Moon, wealth, development, space
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik