By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
In an effort to curry favour with the Labour opposition; British PM Theresa May will meet their leader Jeremy Corbyn today, likely with the aim of convincing him to back her much maligned Brexit deal. But will May’s proposals fall on deaf ears? Sputnik spoke with Dr Connal Parr; lecturer in History at the University of Northumbria for more.
Sputnik: Will Prime Minister Theresa May be able to convince Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to back her Brexit deal?
Dr Connal Parr: I think that we've seen Theresa May be criticised and be challenged for the Tory leadership by her colleagues before today fairly impotently in the past, but I would be very surprised if these current meetings; given some of the rhetoric that we are hearing from both the ERG and other members of the Conservative Party, doesn't lead to a focusing of minds within the Tory party, which finds this from Theresa May a bit beyond the pale for them.
It's a very big gamble on her part, in the sense of; by reaching out to Labour, and by reaching out to Jeremy Corbyn, who Jacob Rees-Mogg described as a Marxist and someone who is pretty abhorrent to most Tories, is really a bit of a bridge too far for the Conservative party.
I understand May is doing this for the first time in some ways, for the actual country to avoid the no deal Brexit situation, and the UK crashing out without a deal, and it's probably the best thing for her to do.
Sputnik: Would the EU necessarily back a further extension of Article Fifty?
Dr Connal Parr: What strikes me when I look at the coverage of this situation; comparing the British media to the European media, is that the European media and the EU itself has been preparing some time for a no deal scenario, and there seems to be this sort of abstract world where people in the Conservative party, and the sympathetic media that sometimes exists for them in the UK, is having a debate about constant extensions, changes, negotiations for a new deal which they have been told constantly is not available to them as an option, and all the while, the EU for some time has been preparing for that scenario.
They've been preparing for that situation, and therefore they may not guarantee an extension. It would be interesting to see what Ireland's perspective on this is, because Ireland has the most to lose out because of the prospect of a hard border returning to the island of Ireland, which is what the backstop as a tool is meant to prevent.
Ireland might be the one who says hang on here; we do actually need an extension to this process to prevent this very damaging situation arising, which is also going to have a harmful impact on the Irish economy.
The views expressed in this article are solely those of Dr Connal Parrand do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.