Earlier, Donald Trump labelled the Mueller investigation "an attempted takeover of the US government". Speaking to FOX News, Trump said that if the Republican Party had done this to President Obama, they would have 100 people in jail right now and it would be considered treason. However, President Trump evaded a question on possible pardons for his former associates. 34 people were charged during the course of the investigation. He said that he doesn't want to talk about pardons "right now", adding that the investigation was "sad on so many levels".
Sputnik discussed the investigation into President Trump with Jim Hoft, writer, speaker and the founder of the Gateway Pundit website.
Sputnik: Ever since the probe started, the mainstream media have been eager to promote the idea of Trump's collusion with Russia. Why do you think that was the case? I mean, this is really unprecedented to have this kind of an investigation into any president, isn't it?
Jim Hoft: Oh, absolutely. I think it was even before this president was elected that they were out to get him. I think we are going to find out a lot more about what actually happened in the coming weeks. At the Gateway Pundit, the website that I run, we are in the middle of the country, we are pretty much Trump country. So, we have a different perspective than you might get from the coast, the West Coast or the East Coast. [There is] Huge Trump support out here, and we always saw it as, Trump described it as a ‘witch hunt'.
We were pretty…I think Trump's kept his support out here in the Midwest, and it was just outlandish what we saw going on. And I hope… Some Conservatives, some Republicans are saying that Trump needs to move on, but I think his base, his base of support here in Middle America, they want him to proceed and find out what exactly happened so that this doesn't happen again to another future president.
Sputnik: The thing is that Trump, of course, is not out of hot water yet. The report did not exonerate him and there are still issues regarding the obstruction of justice, which I think will be left up to Congress to decide.
Sputnik: But it seems that more than half of Americans, to this day, regardless of the fact that the preliminary report came out, they still believe that Donald Trump was, in fact, working with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential elections. That is [according to] a Reuters/Ipsos poll that was published on Tuesday. And 53 per cent of respondents also said that Donald Trump tried to stop investigations into Russian influence on his administration. How can you explain that? What do you think is behind that?
It was never built; there was never a contract on it, anything like that. They tried to make that a part of the picture. I think they stressed everywhere they could to make this man look guilty. And I just disagree that there was anything there to start with. And I think as this settles and as more information comes out on the people who were actually spying on Trump and setting up his campaign officials, I think Americans are going to be outraged.
Sputnik: Do you think that releasing a full report would help change the view of those Americans who continue to believe?
Jim Hoft: Well, you know, that is a great question. But what they are not telling you is the fact that with an investigation like this, if you have innocent people who have been questioned, brought in… As Rush Limbaugh, a famous radio host in America, said: "This was the largest awful research investigation ever on any candidate". And I agree with Rush; they brought in so many people who were peripheral to Trump campaign and questioned them and got a lot of information. I don't think the public has a right to harass these people anymore.
When you have innocent people, you don't release and you don't smear their names in public. I don't think we will ever see the full report but I think it is a good political talking point for the Democrats because then they can make people still question if there still might be something there when we all know that there was nothing there to begin with.
Sputnik: Why do you have doubts that we will see the full report? I think the American people kind of deserved to see the full report, minus some very sensitive, perhaps, personal details that should be reviewed and perhaps deleted. But don't you think after two years of waiting, after all of the money and effort that was put into this that it should be released?
I do know that there is information there for some of these people who on a Trump campaign actually were set up by the US and set up by Great Britain and some of their intelligence operatives that way. I don't think it is going to reveal anything about Russia.
The views expressed in this article are solely those of Jim Hoft and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.