By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that Beijing will take all necessary measures to defend the rights and interests of Chinese companies. Sputnik talked about Huawei’s lawsuit against the US government with Andrew Leung, an independent China strategist based in Hong Kong.
Sputnik: This story has been ongoing for a few months since the arrest of chief financial officer in Canada. What's your take on the US-led campaign against Huawei? Are the accusations of espionage and ties to the Communist Party founded? My colleague read out that it was political suppression, it's more than that isn't it? It's economic suppression as well?
Andrew Leung: I think that the whole issue should be put in the context of a 360 degree push back against China on all fronts. You have the ongoing trade war and now the Huawei case is the thin end of the wedge of a technology war between the two countries, and then you have the military confrontations in the South China Sea and the so-called freedom of navigation operations; you have the continuing supply of arms to Taiwan and also highlighting or focusing on perceived violations of human rights. For example, in China, the Xinjiang Uighurs. And then you can even see that diplomatically, the United States is forming closer alliances and mounting a containment tactic on all fronts. So I think Beijing is very clear about this.
As far as Huawei is concerned, Huawei is, of course, the pride of China's technological progress. Huawei is a very special company, regardless of its origin, because if you look around the world, they come from different sectors or fields, but aside from the origin of the founder of Huawei, the company is almost entirely owned by the staff. I mean over 98% of the shares are owned by the staff of Huawei. And secondly, Huawei has a global staff, something like 170,000 people. 45% of the total staff are engaged in research and development, so it's a very high-tech company right from the start.
Throughout the past two decades, Huawei has been working silently and diligently winning the trust of the customers worldwide, so at the moment it has penetrated this high-tech market in 160 countries worldwide and it's a remarkable achievement, because all these countries don't have to buy Huawei products, there are all sorts of other alternatives. But as far as 5G is concerned Huawei is now leading the world, even ahead of the United States. The United States doesn't produce 5G infrastructure, very little products and services are produced by American companies. The nearest competitor of Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia, European companies. But even Ericsson and Nokia are miles behind Huawei in terms of the sophistication of technology, as well as the rollout of infrastructure.
So I think that all of a sudden the United States seems to realize that China is getting ahead of the game and this is part of a perceived global threat of China threatening Americans dominance in the world, the so-called Pax Americana, which has defined world order since the Second World War, it seems to be coming to an end. That worries a lot of American strategists, and this concern is bipartisan, you can't just blame it all on the Trump administration, there are thinkers and informers and people influence on both sides of the aisle in the United States.
Now, of course, China's trade practices also have caused a lot of other problems. It's perceived to be hereditary, there's a great deal of state subsidies it is perceived pushing all these Chinese companies, buying up technology, cornering markets and China's perceived to be forcing investors in China to share the technology or to transfer the technology, and there are allegations of intellectual property theft. So all these add up and, as far as Huawei is concerned, it is now in commanding height of 5G, as I said, threatening America's dominance.
Now when China was first helped to join the WTO, in the international liberal economic order, the hope was that China would become more like the United States, becoming more liberal if not totally democratic, opening up its economy, as at least a member of an international liberal order led by the United States. At that time China was producing Nike shoes, T-shirts and things like that at the low-end, it's not threatening America at all, on the contrary, all these products, the vast majority of the products accrued to the United States, but now China is perceived to be eating America's lunch, so Huawei's story must be seen in this context.
The views expressed in this article are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.