17:11 GMT +314 December 2018
Listen Live
    Cyber space

    Could a Cyber Cuban Missile Crisis Erupt?

    CC0
    Opinion
    Get short URL
    110

    Just about everyone remembers the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 that led to the propagation of nuclear weapons around the world and the confrontation that led civilisation to the brink of catastrophe. Experts say that the planet is currently facing a new global threat of cyberattacks.

    Is the threat of a cyber Cuban Missile Crisis a possibility?

    Sputnik has spoken to Vladimir Orlov, Head of the Centre for Global Problems from the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, founder of the PIR-Centre, member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the UN Secretary-General for Disarmament, and author of an article on the threat of a "new Cuban Missile Crisis" in cyberspace.

    "I think that there is a high chance of a cyber crisis between world's cyberpowers. Of course, it's possible to avoid it. If the states of the world take up the task of reducing tensions, they can come up with certain diplomatic tools that would help them do that", Orlov told Sputnik.

    When speaking of cyber-powers, the expert primarily means Russia and the USA, but China should also be regarded as a possible participant of cyberwars.

    "This is a crucial difference from the classic nuclear missile crisis, when there were two nuclear superpowers, the USSR and the US, and there was no third party; and here there may even be a fourth and a fifth; because there is a large number of both state and non-state actors in cyberspace", Orlov explained.

    READ MORE: ‘Andres Manuelovich': The Resistance Links Mexico's New President to Russian Op

    The expert believes that there is a range of obstacles that won't let us implement a cyber-proliferation regime similar to the NPT. Yet it is necessary to strive towards international treaty mechanisms, such as a trust or certain rules of conduct in cyberspace.

    According to Vladimir Orlov, there are two possible scenarios.

    "If total trust in the area starts to dissolve, the Americans will realise that they have to sit down and negotiate. And if a constructive conversation starts with no accusations, reproaches, and suspicion, at least between Russia and the US, then there will be a chance that these two states will pave the way for a multilateral mechanism".

    Another scenario is a confrontation in cyberspace between Russia and the US, or the US and China.

    The expert points out that when Soviet missiles were deployed to Cuba, few knew about it. The man in the street didn't think about that until September 1962, when the Americans made it public. Today, the average person is a regular user of the internet and social networks and what might affect him or her are viruses or cyber theft, which has nothing to do with possible cyberwars between nations.

    "However, when the internet is blocked, when large sections of the internet are taken over, and certain social networks are blocked, an ordinary user will realise that. This would make the average person realise they've been involved in a war; but even this would be the softest scenario", Orlov said.

    He warns that it will be much more dangerous if this causes a paralysis or failure of critical infrastructure elements that depend on the internet, such as transport, power grids, or energy monitoring systems.

    In his opinion, being very involved in cyberspace, the US should be interested in "talking, solving, and prevention".

    "But today it seems that any agreement is alien to the ideology of the Republican administration; they are convinced of their dominance in cyberspace. They're convinced of their ability to dictate terms and conditions and continue carrying out covert operations, of which Snowden told us. But today, everything has advanced a lot. So they think: ‘Why would we do that? It'll be much better if we don't have our hands tied so that we can act as we want'".

    READ MORE: Cyber Experts Weigh France's Chances to Escape US, China High-Tech Dominance

    At the same time, Orlov admits that there are people among the US establishment who are more prone to support international accords; but they are mostly Democrats.

    "However, it is the Democrats who now feel offended by Russia, which supposedly intervened in the US elections. The allegations are unfounded and are unconfirmed, but the resentment still lingers. Therefore, those who generally support multilateral treaties are now strongly opposed to any agreement with Russia".

    Orlov believes that cyber weapons can lead to very serious consequences. At the same time, he also says it's impossible to compare them to nuclear weapons due to the level of destruction they can cause.

    "It would be a total war, but it will not necessarily lead to a regional or global catastrophe with a number of victims comparable to the use of weapons of mass destruction", he told Sputnik.

    The risk increases due to the uncertainty about who uses cyber weapons and where they are used; whether they are terrorists or forces acting on instructions of states, or whether they are the states themselves.

    "This uncertainty leads to an increase in tensions and, sometimes, a desire to respond in an inappropriate way. US doctrinal documents have already recorded the possibility of a nuclear response to the use of cyber weapons", Orlov concluded.

    The views expressed in this article are solely those of Vladimir Orlov and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

    Related:

    Analyst: US Not in Habit of Sharing Its Offensive Cyber Capabilities
    Cyber Expert on Alleged Chinese Spy Chips: 'This Can Have Significant Impact'
    Google Is Walking on the Razor's Edge – Cyber Security Expert
    Tags:
    proliferation, crisis, cybersecurity, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik