Sputnik discussed the issue with Professor Theo Boer, who teaches ethics at Groningen's Protestant Theological University and is a leading expert on the ethics of assisted dying.
Sputnik: This is a very difficult topic to talk about. I have had several discussions with various experts, and there were people who are pro and definitely against assisted dying: euthanasia. We will delve into this, but first let's talk about this particular case and what you personally think about this.
Theo Boer: This is a groundbreaking case, because for the first time in 16 years the Dutch government will now prosecute a physician that has performed euthanasia. The matter is so important because here a lady was euthanized who no longer was competent, she was in a deep stage of dementia.
Sputnik: How do we explain in this particular case the doctor breaching the ethics or the laws of assisted dying? Where was the breach in this particular case?
Theo Boer: The question really is whether it was a breach, because the law says that a doctor may be allowed to act on the basis of an advanced directive of a patient; so, that is what she did. The tender committee said that the fact that they sedated her, made her sleepy before the euthanasia, took away from her the possibility to resist the euthanasia. They really should have stopped euthanizing her as soon as they found out that she was resisting.
Sputnik: If I am correct, it said that the lady had signed off on a paper where it said she wanted euthanasia if she was competent in her mind at the time, which, of course, she was not.
Theo Boer: There are really two questions here. One is what kind of advanced directive we may use; and the other one is when somebody is in a state of incompetence, are we at all allowed to euthanize this person? There is a very salient feature here, and that is that the controlling committee of the Dutch government just one week ago approved another case which is very similar. That makes us confused.
The other case that was approved was of a woman who also had an advanced directive and she was given sedatives in a much higher dosage so that she could no longer wake up when the euthanasia was performed; and this case was approved. It leaves everyone in confusion over what is allowed and what is not.
Sputnik: It certainly seems to be a really grey area legally and morally, isn't it?
What I see in the society is that doctors no longer want to kill someone who no longer knows what is going on; and I really hope that the judge will make clear that you cannot euthanize someone who no longer knows what you are doing.
Sputnik: In this particular trial, will it be an important precedent?
Theo Boer: Yes, it will, because in the Dutch system, of course, as in most countries, a verdict of a judge will make clear to what extent you can implement the law. This is a very important case. Again, what is confusing is that the review committee had just approved another case which is very similar. We'll see what happens; and maybe what we'll see here is a kind of a fight between two different committees — there's the Euthanasia Review Committee that has approved the last case, and there's the Public Prosecutor, who says "no, you are overstepping a boundary."
Sputnik: Of course, as you have just said, the Netherlands was in a way a trailblazer when it came to legal suicide; what is your take on the practice in the Netherlands currently?
Theo Boer: I was on the Euthanasia Review Committee for 10 years in which I saw about four thousand cases. I have seen the development since 2005, from euthanasia being a last resort, an exception in the case of intolerable suffering, to a kind of a normal way or a preferred way to die.
I think that that development is a wrong one. The Dutch law still forbids euthanasia and says that it should be a last resort; but the public goes on seeing euthanasia as a normal way to die. I think here we have entered a slippery slope that no one really anticipated, which is alarming.
Sputnik: Of course, the number of people euthanized is growing. In the Netherlands it is expected to exceed 7,000 this year; that's a 63% increase since 5 years ago. That's huge.
What may happen now is that we have come to a point where doctors say "Okay, no more; enough for us. We will no longer cooperate in expanding this practice." But really, it's too early to say.
The views expressed in this article are solely those of Professor Theo Boer and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.