03:21 GMT +318 November 2018
Listen Live
    Soldiers stand on a tank of the Saudi-led coalition deployed on the outskirts of the southern Yemeni port city of Aden on August 3, 2015, during a military operation against Shiite Huthi rebels and their allies.

    Berlin's Calls to Halt Arms Sales to Riyadh Part of Political Charade – Journo

    © AFP 2018 / Saleh Al-Obeidi
    Opinion
    Get short URL
    151

    German Economic Affairs Minister Peter Altmaier has called upon EU member states to stop arms exports to Saudi Arabia over the Khashoggi case. Speaking to Radio Sputnik, Sarah Abed, an independent journalist and political commentator, shared her views on Berlin's intention to suspend the deals with Riyadh and the US-Saudi relationship.

    Sputnik: Merkel says that the issue of arms sales to Saudi Arabia is in question after the death of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. What are the odds that Berlin will actually suspend the deals with the kingdom?

    Sarah Abed: I think it is very unlikely. I mean there is a difference between trying to save face by mouthing concern and actually suspending deals that would put Germany at a risk of losing millions of euros. And if we were to briefly revisit what's taken place this year we can better understand this. So, back in January, the German government had announced that it would halt all arms exports to countries involved in the ongoing war in Yemen. And this was right after the Saudis had bombed a wedding.

    But then in March, they [Germany] authorized an arms export worth 254 million euros to Saudi Arabia and then in April they had set to ban arms sale to three countries, namely Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the UAE, based on human rights abuses under a draft bill that was proposed by the opposition Social Democratic Party which would have made it illegal to sell arms, expertise, and whatever other related goods to any government suspected of using these items to abuse human rights. But so far this year, the German government has approved almost half a billion euros worth of arms sales to Saudi Arabia, which makes it the second largest recipient after Algeria. So this is just one example of the hypocrisy.

    READ MORE: 'Can Never Happen Again': Riyadh Vows Thorough Probe Into Khashoggi's Death

    Sputnik: Donald Trump came right out, almost immediately, saying that "We are going to put sanctions, we are going definitely respond if we find out that the journalist was in fact murdered in the consulate and there's no good explanation for this." But right away, he said that "There's no way that we are going to call off our $110 billion arms deal because that would be hurting the US." Is Saudi Arabia in a position that they can basically do anything they want and not have to worry about sanctions that are in any case aimed at the sale of arms because this is just too profitable?

    Sarah Abed: Yes, exactly. So, basically saying that they are going to put them on hold and actually terminating existing deals are two very, very different things. So, a few countries including the US, yeah, they're probably going to come out and say they are going to put deals on hold, but that's just to continue the political charade that's going on. The US definitely does not want to lose a $15 billion dollar arms deal to a more cost-effective alternative with a competitor, which they've even mentioned. And Trump even said that it could cost a million American jobs. So, the bottom line is dollars and cents are the leading decision-makers here.

    READ MORE: French Arms Export to Saudi Arabia Face Analysis of Official Commission — Paris

    Sputnik: How self-sustaining is Riyadh, really? The clout that they have has to do with money and has to also do with oil, which the US is able to get at very low prices and it just seems that there aren't measures likely to be put in place by the US without fear of losing out on cheap oil or the 600,000 jobs that Donald Trump has been talking about or the $110 billion in arms?

    Sarah Abed: The relationship with Riyadh definitely benefits the US. It benefits the US even more than it benefits Riyadh. The US is not going to destroy that relationship. As much as we hear them say  'well, we're going to do this and that', they're not. That's the thing, they're not. If we were going to just look at an example, the fact is, they're saying "Oh yeah, we want a credible investigation to take place." And then Riyadh says, "Okay, this is what happened; we've arrested 18 people that were involved; he was killed, but we've done our due diligence to their satisfaction."

    READ MORE: Turkey Does Not Want Khashoggi Case to Damage Relations With Saudis — Spokesman

    If we were just to remember back to what happened in Syria, the US and the UK had absolutely no problem bombing and illegally attacking Syria based on false allegations before doing any sort of credible investigation, before even waiting for the investigation to take place. So, you could just use that as an example that they don't really care about the investigation, they care about their deals, their arms deals and how much profit they can get from that relationship. They are not going to destroy their relationship over one journalist.     

    The views and opinions expressed by Sarah Abed do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    Related:

    'Can Never Happen Again': Riyadh Vows Thorough Probe Into Khashoggi's Death
    'Plot Gone Awry': Trump Reportedly Slams Khashoggi's Death as Foolish, Stupid
    US Congress Urges Intel Chief to Disclose Intercepts of Saudi Khashoggi Plot
    Saudi Crown Prince's Brother Met Khashoggi Months Before Murder – Reports
    Riyadh to Host Investment Forum Amid Political Tensions Over Khashoggi's Death
    Tags:
    oil, air strikes, arms deal, jobs, sanctions, weapons, Jamal Khashoggi, Donald Trump, Germany, Turkey, Syria, United States, Middle East, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik