By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
Belgian voters have cast their ballots to pick candidates for provincial, district and municipal offices. Radio Sputnik discussed the vote with Lode Vanoost, political analyst and former deputy speaker of the Belgian parliament.
Sputnik: The election in Belgium has not received major media coverage. But was there anything to watch out for in the vote?
Lode Vanoost: The Belgian political context is complex as with its three language communities and all the structure that it has on the state, regional and the municipal levels. So, foreign audiences will stick to the general impressions that [they have] gathered. On the Flemish side, the Dutch-speaking part of the country, everything you could say is that on the ideological level it’s more or less a bit of steady growth because the extreme right parties, the National Flemish Alliance and the Flemish Bloc, did have some spectacular losses and some spectacular gains. Overall, when you combine the votes, the extreme right wing has slightly gone up. The biggest loser on the Flemish side of the country is the traditional Social Democratic Party which is now really fighting for its survival. It’s no longer one of the leading traditional parties in the country. The thing is that in Brussels, the capital, and in the
French-speaking part of the country, Wallonia, the situation is quite different – the Social Democrats there, although they had some big losses, are still the biggest party there. The one thing that is also striking is that the extreme left Workers’ Party has made some significant gains in the French-speaking part and less so in the Flemish part of the country. We should bear in mind that these are local elections; although the two extreme right-wing parties in the Flemish part did push a very nationalist campaign focusing on the immigration issue and the refugee crisis, what we see is that, and it’s quite logical for any voter, voters vote on the basis of local issues and on the basis of local people that they know. What we see is that the mayors that did quite well for the past six years, regardless of what party they were from, did quite well this time; again the elections have seen some exceptions. In that common data analysis in the mainstream media that would like to see and analyze trends for the upcoming federal elections next year, I think that it’s quite difficult to see anything, as these are local elections. You also shouldn’t forget that the themes that were quite prevalent on the federal and national level – austerity issues like the pension reform plan and other things – haven’t played a role in these elections. What’s at stake next year is really hard to tell. One can’t deduce anything significant from these elections.
Sputnik: Many European countries are actually seeing an increase in right-wing sentiments, and actually right-wing extreme sentiments. We’re seeing a decrease in centrist parties. Would you say that’s the case in Belgium as well?
Lode Vanoost: Yes, that’s taking apart the local issues and the local vote. On the whole, in Belgium the traditional parties are losing their grip; the centrist parties of traditional power that ruled the country for more than 100 years now represent less than one third of all the votes. And also the extreme right vote is still quite significant – it’s 30 to 35 per cent with the two parties combined. But it hasn’t grown substantially during these local elections; it was more of a steady growth of votes, which is still problematic. But to say that in the last three or four years there has been a rise of the extreme right wing in Belgium is simply not true.
The views expressed in this article are those of the speaker, and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.