00:12 GMT15 May 2021
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    According to the US state secretary, US is ready to engage in dialogue with Pyongyang. Pompeo is committed to the rapid denuclearization of DPRK, which will reportedly be completed by 2021. Sputnik discussed the prospects of denuclearization with Dr. Zhang Baohui, director of the Center for Asian Pacific Studies at Lingnan University in Hong Kong.

    Sputnik: For the first time, the US announced a clear date – January 2021 – for the denuclearization of North Korea. What are your thoughts on this?

    Zhang Baohui: Frankly, I’m not very hopeful because President Moon during his current visit to Pyeongyang hasn’t succeeded in achieving a roadmap for the so-called full and irreversible denuclearization of North Korea. North Korea only promised to shut down the ICBM testing site, but it’s not important really because it’s not about North Korean nuclear capabilities. He also said he’s got enough from the Americans, for example, the reverse of the sanctions and the establishment of food relations. They may also shut down the Yongbyon nuclear facility, but even that won’t have much to do with denuclearization because, as estimated by US intelligence, North Korea may already possess from 20 to 60 nuclear warheads. There’s no indication from Kim that North Korea will agree to denuclearize completely, including its existing nuclear weapons stockpile, so I’m not really optimistic about what may happen in the next two years.

    Sputnik: How much are Washington and Pyeongyang on the same page when it comes to denuclearization; what does it mean for both parties? You’ve mentioned your reservations, but do you think that things moving forward can be achieved even if January 2021 is not a realistic date?

    Zhang Baohui: They are on the same page in terms of political commitment to the issue. Kim has repeatedly expressed his willingness to proceed with denuclearization, but the question always lingers because we don’t really have a mutually agreed denuclearization timetable. If the Americans present their own timetable of denuclearization by 2021, it doesn’t mean that Kim will actually accept that. I think that at this time it is premature to try to foretell the future because North Korea is a highly unpredictable country. We just don’t know whether Kim will completely denuclearize.

    Sputnik: Meanwhile, the leaders of the two Koreas achieved a landmark agreement bringing the two nations closer than ever; what will it mean for the stability of the region?

    Zhang Baohui: I think this is a major achievement by President Moon; he is a true peacemaker. By this Pyeongyang visit, the two sides have consolidated the progress made in 2018. The two militaries have also designed a separate pact to promote transparency and mutual confidence. I think the Korean Peninsula will definitely become more peaceful and stable and that will benefit the entire region.

    Sputnik: How long-lasting is the apparent amiability between Seoul and Pyeongyang? Is there an artificialness to it or is there some longevity?

    Zhang Baohui: I don’t think that either party wants to fight a war. The problem is that Moon is under domestic pressure to deliver his promise, which is that he can use a new strategy, which is peacemaking and economic integration, to motivate Kim to denuclearize. But the fundamental question is will Kim denuclearize? According to the latest public opinion surveys, more and more South Koreans are losing confidence in this promise; I think that is a big problem in the long term. The stability issue isn’t decided by the two Koreas, it also involves the US. If the Trump administration in the end believes that Kim is not sincere and that he won’t denuclearize, the US will certainly revert back to the 2017 posture, which is threats and sanctions; and the current honeymoon will be over.

    Sputnik: China has welcomed the outcome of the inter-Korean summit and pledged to support both sides in further talks on reducing tensions; what role could Beijing play in the intricate situation on the peninsula? The relationships between all the key players, the countries on the peninsula, China and the US; what’s your take on the situation with regard to the input that China has stated?

    Zhang Baohui: The positive contributions by China could be encouragements to North Korea to proceed with denuclearization. China may promise more economic aid in exchange to North Korea’s compliance to this agreement with the US and North Korea. That could be the role of China. But at the same time Trump has been criticizing China for negative roles. For example, he said that China is increasing economic aid to North Korea and that actually has an effect on North Korea’s motives not to proceed with denuclearization because China is now a main economic provider to North Korea and so North Korea would have fewer incentives to denuclearize. I think that the Chinese role and its effects are very murky. China says that its role is positive, but Trump has been criticizing China for the opposite.

    The views expressed in this article are those of the speaker, and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.


    Pompeo Announces Special Envoy to N Korea to Oversee Denuclearization Progress
    N Korean FM Slams US' Stance on Pyongyang's Denuclearization Drive
    DNI Doubts North Korea Will Denuclearize Within 1 Year
    US, North Korea Create Working Group on Aspects of Denuclearization
    Pompeo: US Hopes for Denuclearization of Korean Peninsula Within 2.5 Years
    Trump Fails, Kim Scores Easy Victory Without Denuclearization Roadmap - Scholars
    denuclearization, Donald Trump, Mike Pompeo, Kim Jong-un, US, South Korea, Democratic Republic of North Korea (DPRK)
    Community standardsDiscussion