22:34 GMT +321 August 2018
Listen Live
    Graffiti with anti-US slogan is seen decorating the wall of a building in Tehran on July 14, 2015

    Ex-Diplomat to Sputnik: US Invasion of Iran Would Plunge Entire Region Into War

    © AFP 2018 / ATTA KENARE
    Opinion
    Get short URL
    25251

    Canberra has dispelled rumors of "imminent" US strikes against Iran after government sources told Australian media that Washington may be preparing an attack. Meanwhile, the National Interest has published a piece considering a US invasion of Iran in 2026. Sputnik spoke to an Iranian ex-diplomat about what US aggression would mean for the region.

    Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has dismissed the idea that Washington was preparing to strike Iranian nuclear facilities as "speculation" following a report by following a report citing senior security sources by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation saying that such strikes may come as soon as sometime in August.

    The news comes after the appearance of a narrative-style article in the National Interest late last month speculating that the US may launch an Iraq-style "Operation Iranian Freedom" in 2026 after the US finds 'irrefutable evidence' that Iran is enriching weapons-grade uranium and launches a ground campaign from the former state of Iraq, which has split at this point into Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish-controlled statelets. 

    Speaking to Sputnik Persian about these scenarios, Dr. Seyed Hadi Afghahi, Middle Eastern affairs expert and former official at the Iranian embassy in Lebanon, commented on their realism in light of recent events in the region.

    "For starters, the scenario of a military invasion [described by the National Interest] is only a fantasy of its authors and is not backed by any documentary evidence," Afghahi said. "Secondly, the conditions in the region for implementing such an invasion scenario by the Americans and their allies (be it the British, the French or even the Saudis) are not favorable," he added. "Moreover, neither the Americans nor any European powers really believe that an attack on Iran would 'tame it' or 'put it in its place'…"

    According to the analyst, Washington currently faces a much more urgent problem. "When Donald Trump threatened to cut off the exports of Iranian oil, he received a threat in response. Our political and military leadership has indicated that even before the start of such an oil embargo, Iran would close the Strait of Hormuz," i.e. the choke point between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman through which some 20 percent of the world's crude oil supplies flow.

    Some regional oil exporters are already facing problems related to security, Afghahi noted. "Saudi Arabia recently suspended oil exports through Bab-el-Mandeb," (the strait situated between Yemen and Djibouti) "due to rocket attacks by Yemen against Saudi oil tankers. All this is taking place even before the coming US oil embargo against Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz."

    Pointing to the increasingly hostile rhetoric coming from both sides, the former diplomat stressed that the fate of the Hormuz Strait was "a very sensitive issue which could plunge the whole region into a military conflict which would bring absolutely no benefit to the US. If this happens, the US would be to blame, given that they have come here from across the ocean and are trying to foment unrest in the Strait. If a clash does occur, it will not be limited to Iran and the US. Many countries and jihadist groups from various countries will enter into the fray," Afghahi warned.

    "Therefore, the actual date of the military conflict, be it tomorrow or in 2026, is of little importance. Iran is prepared, under any circumstances, to repel invading forces, even if they are numerically superior to our own," the observer emphasized.

    A Divided Iraq?

    As far as the National Interest scenario's assumption about the division of Iraq into several separate entities were concerned, Afghahi argued that these weren't far off from Washington's actual strategy.

    "For the Americans, the division of Iraq is an important question. They have carefully sought to implement it, but have not succeeded so far. First they created Daesh (ISIS)*, which they wanted to use to create a Sunni quasi-state. In the space of just over two years, Daesh collapsed, having been defeated by the Iraqi government army, the Iranian military and the Popular Mobilization Forces [an umbrella group consisting of 40 Iraqi militias]."

    Ralph Peters' solution to the Middle East
    Ralph Peters' solution to the Middle East

    Later Afghahi noted, "the Americans decided to take a chance and bet on the Kurds. Even before Daesh was defeated and Mosul freed, [Iraqi Kurdish leader] Masoud Barzani decided to declare Iraqi Kurdistan's complete independence from the government in Baghdad, and a referendum was called. But the Iraqi central government, as well as Iran, Syria and Turkey, opposed such a scenario, given that it would signal the start of a series of complex and dangerous events affecting the territorial integrity of all four countries."

    "In the end, the Iraqi army and the Popular Mobilization Forces moved in the direction of autonomy for Iraqi Kurdistan, and literally snatched Kirkuk, one of the largest oil and gas fields in the world, from Barzani. The Kurdish leader retreated. Therefore, today, the question of dividing Iraq into separate states has become impossible, despite American wishes," Afghahi said.

    Banners calling for voting in a referendum on Iraqi Kurdistan independence from Baghdad in Erbil
    © Sputnik / Dmitriy Vinogradov
    Banners calling for voting in a referendum on Iraqi Kurdistan independence from Baghdad in Erbil

    According to the analyst, US pressure aimed at weakening and dividing Iraq will continue, as evidenced most recently by the Electoral Commission's failure to declare an official winner to the May 2018 elections, which saw the victory of the forces of the so-called front of resistance opposing the US presence. "Without confirmation that the elections took place, a parliament composed of the winners cannot be created, and the country's leaders – the president and the prime minister, cannot be chosen…The American plan for Iraq is to plunge the country into a 'tunnel of darkness', with a paralyzed government without a president or ministers."

    Ultimately, Afghahi warned that should the US attempt to use Iraq as a jumping off point for an invasion of Iran, the Iraqi government army and the Popular Mobilization Forces would help to repulse it.

    The views expressed by Dr. Seyed Hadi Afghahi are those of the speaker, and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    * A terrorist group banned in Russia and many other countries.

    Related:

    Israeli MP Concerned Iran's Troops May Remain in Golans Alongside Syrian Army
    Iran's Zarif Blasts US Gulf Buildup, Notes US Navy Over 7,000 Miles From Home
    Austria's OMV Asks EU for Help Amid US Sanctions Pressure on Iran, Nord Stream 2
    Iran’s Navy Assembles Near Mouth of Persian Gulf, US ‘Monitoring it Closely’
    Why Trump's Offer of Talks With Iran Triggers Strong Sense of Déjà vu
    Attacks, Tough Measures: Paris Compares Trump's Approach to Iran and North Korea
    Iran Would Cut Off Its Own Foot By Closing Strait of Hormuz - Analyst
    Pushing Iran to the Brink
    Hormuz Security Influences Those Threatening Iran With Petrodollars – Navy Chief
    EU Seeks to Continue Cooperation With Iran Despite US Sanctions - Mogherini
    Tags:
    geopolitics, diplomacy, expert analysis, analysis, consequences, invasion, Daesh, Iran, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment