Sputnik has discussed the UK Prime Minister Theresa May's strive for healthcare "sustainable funding increases", promised by Jeremy Hunt, with Professor Malcolm Prowle, professor of business performance at Nottingham business school.
Sputnik: The prime minister intends to ramp up spending in order to show that the Conservatives can be trusted to run the NHS and because it needs extra cash to tackle chronic understaffing, cope with the aging population and improve care... how significant is this?
Sputnik: If this commitment from Theresa May and the government goes ahead, what will this funding look like? For example, will it focus on recruitment and frontline NHS services or wasted on controversial and unpopular PFI contracts?
Malcolm Prowle: We don't know, if you look at history, in the early 2000s the NHS was getting record growth in funding, and what we know historically is that a proportion of that funding, perhaps 60%, was wasted on things that didn't need to be done, so it's not a very good precedence. It's very difficult for governments to specify what the money is going to be spent on, because local NHS trust quite a bit of discretion on that.
Sputnik: Time and time again we've seen the current conservative government backtrack on their commitments to the NHS or implement policies that impact doctors and nurses working in the public sector. On top of that, we've also seen the first stages of privatization of the NHS under the governments of Cameron and May. Can public sector workers and moreover the British public really trust the government to increase NHS funding?
Malcolm Prowle: I don't think we can trust any government to deal with constant funding; I have to say what I've seen with Theresa May... this is pathetic. We're talking about a birthday present for the NHS. This is not a child birthday; this is an essential public service and it either needs more money or it doesn't. I'm to think it needs more money and to call it a birthday present is pathetic. This money is our money, we paid our taxes, and this is our money. All their doing is giving us back our money; they're not giving out of their pockets. So I think it's a pathetic way to describe it, if they are saying: "well, we recognize, after long last that the NHS is underfunded and we are going to do something about it..." then at least that's being honest. But they're not being honest.
The views and opinions expressed by Malcolm Prowle are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.