Sputnik: High level officials of the two Koreas are expected to meet on a number of occasions in the coming months, with one of the meetings focusing on military issues. What is your take on this slew of inter-Korean activity and negotiations, all ahead of the potential momentous Kim-Trump talks?
Michael Springmann: I think it's a marvelous change in relations between the two Koreas. For the past sixty five years, they've had nothing but hostility, tension, name-calling and military threats between the two countries. I think the fact that they are talking is excellent; granted, Winton Churchill said that 'Jaw, jaw is better than war, war'; in this case I think it's a definite improvement and a great change from the really continued Cold War between the two countries and the United States over the last few decades.
Michael Springmann: They canceled them and then apparently from what I've seen had meetings on Saturday, the 26th of May in the demilitarized zone. I think a lot of the issue about whether the two Koreas will meet sometimes comes from the United States, with pressure on one side to accede to its will rather than the inter-Korean will.
I think the Korean issue is something that can best be resolved by the two Koreas themselves. It's their country, it's their language, and if they want to unify, I think they certainly should be able to do it. And they certainly should be able to talk about it without any outside interference.
Sputnik: President Trump has reportedly said that he does not want President Moon or Prime Minister Abe to be present at his expected talks with Mr. Kim. Why do you think he prefers to act alone in this matter?
Michael Springmann: I think there are a couple of reasons. One of course is that President Trump is widely seen by some people as a narcissist who believes the world revolves around him, and wants complete control of everything surrounding him. So I think he wants to keep as many people out of the final decisions as possible.
Sputnik: In the meantime there's news of F-22 fighter jets temporarily deployed to an airbase in Japan's Okinawa. What would be the reason behind this move? Could it create a certain tension ahead of the potential talks?
Michael Springmann: I think it does. I think the reasons behind the move are remarkably obscure and strange. Granted they've rotated F-22s from a base in Alaska to Kadena, Okinawa several times in the past. But at this point, just before the talks, I find it really peculiar, because the talks are supposed to be in Singapore, which is something like nearly 4,000 km or nearly 2,300 miles from Okinawa.
I can't figure out what they're there for. I can't see anybody wanting to attack the flight that the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un will take…
Sputnik: Japanese and US defense officials have agreed to maintain pressure and sanctions on North Korea in a bid to make it abandon its nuclear capabilities. How achievable is this aim?
Michael Springmann: I don't think it's very practical or achievable. I think the North Korean leadership knows all about what happened to Libya when Muammar Gaddafi gave up his plans for any kind of nuclear weapons and he and his country were destroyed. The North Koreans see the enormous pressure being placed on Iran by previous American administrations and that of President Trump. They don't [even] have nuclear weapons and yet they're being pressured to give up any possibility of ever achieving anything significant in the way of nuclear power in the country.
Michael Springmann served in the United States Department of Commerce and as a diplomat with the State Department's Foreign Service, and went on to become a whistleblower, writer and independent political analyst. The views and opinions expressed by Mr. Springmann are those of the speaker, and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.