10:57 GMT20 October 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    1 0 0

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) – The new US Nuclear Posture Review will boost profits for major military contractors including one that previously employed the man who directed the review, Defense Secretary James Mattis, peace activist Jan Weinberg told Sputnik.

    Washington on Friday released its Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) 2018 which envisages further modernization of US nuclear weaponry, prompting fears among international observers and politicians.

    "I kept it in mind when I read through the Pentagon’s… release of the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review as provided by Secretary of Defense General Jim Mattis (ret.) that… Mattis was previously employed by General Dynamics which is a corporation involved with the manufacturing of nuclear weapons," Weinberg said.

    Weinberg, who is the founder of Show Up! America, a non-profit, said the US government’s ongoing multiple wars around the world and its renewed conventional as well as nuclear armaments programs were proving very profitable for the executives and shareholders of armaments industry corporations.

    Members of Congress, many of whom received lavish campaign contributions from defense contractors and who wanted to bring their operations to their own local districts, were similarly not disposed to ask searching, critical questions about the military buildup, the activist pointed out.

    The new NPR also benefited Lockheed Martin, which is deeply involved in manufacturing nuclear weapons and which also makes the ultra-expensive and long troubled F-35 Lightning II fighters, Weinberg commented.

    "It should come as no surprise that a long-term plan was in place that Lockheed Martin’s F-35 fighter jets would be easily adapted to carry nuclear weapon payloads given that Lockheed Martin is one of the manufacturers of nuclear weapons," he said.

    US armament industry corporations had a direct influence on the shaping of foreign policy objectives, Weinberg observed.

    The new doctrine did not mark a departure or U-turn in US defense policy but rather was an extension of policies and tendencies that had been developing under previous presidents, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, he recalled.

    "It is important to understand that the arms race, including the threat of nuclear weapons, between the United States and both Russia and China has been in play for quite some time, even during the Obama administration," he said.

    Obama was awarded the Noble Peace Prize right after becoming president. However, he then promoted a boycott of the United Nation’s deliberations to ban nuclear weapons and even set in motion – well before Trump took office – $1-trillion revamping of the nuclear weapons arsenal, Weinberg added.

    "In other words – the Pentagon’s annual Nuclear Posture Review is nothing new, albeit extremely shortsighted and dangerous," he concluded.

    The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.


    Trump Orders Nuclear Posture Review, Enhanced Ballistic Missile Capabilities
    Samantha Power Lecturing on War Crimes is Like Quasimodo Lecturing on Posture
    Japan Highly Appreciates New US Nuclear Posture Review - Foreign Minister
    Alleged Nuclear Posture Review Recognizes Russia's Superiority Over US
    Pentagon Plans No Change of Posture in Qatar Amid Doha's Row With Arab States
    Nuclear Posture Review, profits, General Dynamics, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion