16:57 GMT +322 October 2019
Listen Live
    A US Army Soldier 1st Platoon, Apache Company, 2nd Battalion, 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division, walks through a field to the village of Dahanah, Wardak province, Afghanistan Dec. 2.

    Afghan Law Professor Explains Why Hague Can't Try Pentagon, CIA for War Crimes

    © Flickr/ The U.S. Army
    Opinion
    Get short URL
    9510
    Subscribe

    Last month, the International Criminal Court requested permission to investigate alleged war crimes committed during the conflict in Afghanistan by US military personnel and the CIA. Speaking to Sputnik, professor of law Mohammad Farhad Azimi outlined what he said was the main reason Afghan authorities and the ICC can't bring US forces to account.

    An ICC prosecutor requested approval to launch an investigation into alleged US war crimes in the war-torn Central Asian nation, including possible torture, in early November, repeating a similar request made a year earlier. However, for reasons unknown, the investigation was again suspended.

    Legal observers believe the key factor stalling the Hague's investigation stems from the George W. Bush administration's 2002 withdrawal from the ICC's Rome Statute, under which suspected war criminals can be tried.

    However, speaking to Sputnik Dari, Mohammad Farhad Azimi, professor of law at Balkh University in Mazar-e Sharif, explained that another, more important factor, is to blame for justice not being served.

    According to the professor, the security treaty between Afghanistan and the United States, signed by President Ashraf Ghani in 2014, is the key single factor preventing legal action from moving forward, in spite of ample evidence of crimes. The clauses of this treaty explicitly state that the Afghan government does not have authority to deal with crimes committed by US forces on Afghan territory, Azimi explained. 

    Furthermore, he noted, many of the bilateral security treaties the US has with other countries, including some European nations, Japan and Korea, have similar stipulations.

    "Under US law, other countries have no right to investigate crimes against American soldiers and military personnel," under the pretext that "only US courts can ensure a fair investigation of crimes committed by members of the US armed forces," Azimi said. "Accordingly, crimes committed by members of the US military can only be considered in US criminal courts."

    At the same time, the professor lamented, the number of investigations and trials for war crimes in US courts is negligible. According to Azimi, even successfully tried cases often result in verdicts which do not correspond to the scale of crimes committed. 

    For his part, Qazi Mohammad Nazir Hanafi, a member of the Legislative Commission of Afghanistan's lower house of parliament, stressed that the 2014 security agreement was signed in spite of opposition by the Afghan people. The lawmaker told Sputnik that the suspected crimes of US military personnel in Afghanistan often do not even make it to court in the US. "We condemn the US refusal to have its war crimes investigated by the Hague. We call on the ICC to bring the perpetrators to justice so such crimes will not be repeated," he said.

    The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    Related:

    Scrooged: British Troops in Afghanistan Receive Just £1 Each for Christmas
    Activist: War in Afghanistan ‘Not Meant to Be Won, It's Meant to Be Perpetual'
    Car Bombing in S Afghanistan Leaves 6 Policemen Dead – Reports
    Tags:
    war crimes investigation, charges, interview, war crimes, CIA, US military, Afghanistan, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik