"Media bias went for Hillary [Clinton] against Trump, but it had a backfire effect because the media moguls are too self-absorbed to realize how much they are hated," Executive Intelligence Review senior editor Jeff Steinberg told Sputnik.
"Media elites thought they were shaping public opinion, and they were, but in favor of Trump because anyone who the mainstream media hates is just fine with them, regardless of flaws and legitimate concerns," Steinberg averred.
In his view, Trump won because he understood that he could play the mainstream media's animus to his advantage, including news outlets’ disdain for “deplorables” — Clinton’s term for some Trump supporters.
Mainstream American media are working against their own business interests by failing to realize how much they’re disliked by most of the public and are gradually being supplanted by independent digital platforms that they don’t control, Steinberg asserted.
The only way big media companies can reverse this trend and restore public trust is by disconnecting from their corporate sponsors, but that is virtually impossible, according to Steinberg.
Ohio Northern University assistant history professor Robert Waters told Sputnik the media favored Trump during the Republican primary campaign because it was good for ratings. News outlets assumed the New York real estate mogul would be easier for Clinton to beat in the general election – until Trump turned that assumption on its head.
The media could win back Americans’ trust if they began reporting the news fairly, he maintained, but post-election coverage indicates they have "doubled down on bias."
"The New York Times portrayed Trump as saying South Korea and Japan ‘should’ get nuclear weapons to defend themselves against North Korea, when he really said they ‘might’ get nuclear weapons," Waters pointed out.
He said mainstream media overreacted when Trump ditched the pool of journalists who traditionally cover presidents-elect in order to go to dinner with his family, with some outlets calling the snub unprecedented.
"In fact, President-elect Obama had done the same thing in 2008, with hardly a comment from the press," Waters said.
Radio talk show host and journalist Stephen Lendman said he believes the US media operate as agents for “wealth, power and privilege,” an affiliation that helped drive pro-Clinton bias.
This week, Trump criticized the New York Times for poor and inaccurate coverage of what he has been called “the Trump phenomena."
Clinton supporters, for their part, accused mainstream US media of bias against the Democratic candidate throughout her campaign, citing incessant coverage of an FBI investigation into her email practices as US secretary of state.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.