00:26 GMT09 August 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    Violence Erupts as Islamic State Rises (1881)
    0 23

    The Iraqi Parliament's Security and Defense Committee call to review or cancel Baghdad's security pact with the United States is a direct result of Washington's confused and contradictory policies toward Iraq, US experts told Sputnik.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — Iraq was the victim of the failure of US policymakers to understand the many complicated motives that drove its allies in the region to pursue their own agendas first, the veteran analyst commented.

    "The Obama Administration’s policy is confused at best, treacherous at worst, in light of Baghdad’s clear interest in defeating Daesh [Islamic State]," former US Department of State diplomat James Jatras told Sputnik on Wednesday.

    Iraq would be well within its legal and constitutional rights if it chose to terminate the security alliance with Washington, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law professor John Quigley told Sputnik.

    "The [Iraq-US] Strategic Framework Agreement of 2008 contains a provision that allows either party to terminate the agreement by giving one year's notice," Quigley said. "Therefore, if the Iraqi Parliament decides to terminate the agreement, it has every right to do so."

    The Obama administration was pursuing contradictory goals in trying to limit the growth of the Islamic State, without wiping it out it while simultaneously seeking to overthrow the government of Syria, Jatras explained.

    "US and Western policy is hopelessly compromised by swearing hostility to Daesh [Islamic State] on one hand, while on the other hand seeking only to 'contain,' not destroy it, because of the conflicting goals of overthrowing the Syrian government and limiting Iran’s regional influence."

    Jatras also advised Iraqi policymakers to avoid becoming dependent on the US-led NATO alliance.

    "The Iraqi government would do well to rethink its relationship with the United States and to stay as far away from NATO as possible."

    The US government, Jatras pointed out, has continued to give a free hand to Saudi Arabia and Turkey, the latter a NATO member state, even though both countries strongly supported the Islamic State that was bringing havoc to Iraq.

    "Both of those US 'allies' are members of the supposed 'coalition' against Daesh but are in reality allies and supporters of Daesh, as well as of other jihad groups like al-Nusra (al-Qaeda), Ahrar ash-Sham and others seeking to create a sectarian Sunni, Sharia-ruled state."

    Iraq also suffered from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's support of the Islamic State, he added.

    In light of these tangled agendas, almost all of which run counter to Iraq's national interest, it is hard to see how Iraq can rely on anything from Washington, much less from NATO, Jatras concluded.

    The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    Violence Erupts as Islamic State Rises (1881)


    Iran-Backed Shia Forces Threaten Turkey Over 'Incursion' Into Iraq
    Man Pleads Guilty to Assisting Daesh Plan Attack on US Army Base
    Turkey Urges All Citizens to Leave Iraq Immediately
    Turkey Intends to Spread Influence in Region by Invading Northern Iraq
    Risky Move: US Attack Helicopters May Battle Daesh in Ramadi
    Obama Yet to Approve Attack Helicopters Deployment to Iraqi Forces
    NATO, Daesh, al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra Front, Barack Obama, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey, Iraq, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion