16:43 GMT +316 December 2019
Listen Live
    The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Alabama

    US Unlikely to Deploy Missiles to Europe

    © Flickr / Official U.S. Navy Page
    Opinion
    Get short URL
    NATO Seeks Expansion to Eastern Europe (362)
    134
    Subscribe

    The United States is not likely to place nuclear or conventional ground-based cruise and ballistic missiles in response to alleged Russian violations of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, experts told Sputnik.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The United States has accused Russia of conducting test flights of cruise missiles in violation of the Cold War-era INF Treaty. The Treaty prohibits testing, possessing or producing medium-range ground-based cruise and nuclear missiles.

    “It appears unlikely that the United States is going to deploy intermediate range missiles in Europe,” Bilyana Lilly, the author of the book “Russian Foreign Policy toward Missile Defense: Actors, Motivations, and Influence” said.

    “The costs from such a policy are too high, the benefits too low, and the Russian response too unpredictable in the moment for the US to consider it.”

    Russia claims NATO’s ballistic missile defense and the US use of certain drones are a violation of the INF treaty.

    The United States has refrained from publically releasing evidence of a violation, which Russia denies, but is crafting potential responses, according to statements by senior US officials.

    One of the options US officials are considering is to deploy missiles to Europe to defend against any advantage Russia might gain from a ground-based system, or a more aggressive “counterforce” of ground-based strategic weapons or cruise missiles.

    According to Lilly, if such a decision is made it could include the long-range Tomahawk land attack cruise missile. The missiles could be stationed at existing NATO bases in Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.

    The "counterforce" option, Lilly said, “is indeed a possibility but, when evaluating its costs, benefits and consequences, it doesn’t appear to be a viable one.”

    Deploying missiles to Europe would increase costs, raise the risk of human error, and risk escalating tensions with Russia, Lilly added.

    “Russia has sufficiently robust nuclear arsenal to guarantee its nuclear deterrent even if the United States and NATO deploy missile defense or ground-based missiles in Europe.”

    Hans Kristensen, a nuclear expert at the Federation of American Scientists, argued that vague statements by several top Western officials about deploying missiles to Europe have been misinterpreted by media coverage.

    “The rumor mill seems to be escalating faster than the actual East-West conflict, because the news media is trying to outdo itself with the next even more dramatic story.”

    He explained the trend is driven by counterproductive military posturing by NATO as well as Russia “that is combining to be rapidly decreasing security for all in Europe.”

    “It is not my impression from talking to senior US defense officials that the United States is seriously considering developing and redeploying nuclear INF weapons in Europe,” Kristensen added.

    The INF Treaty was signed by the US and the Soviet Union in 1988 and banned nuclear and conventional ground-based cruise and ballistic missiles with a range of 310-3417 miles.

    The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    Topic:
    NATO Seeks Expansion to Eastern Europe (362)

    Related:

    US, Russian Navies Meet to Discuss How to Avoid 'Accidental Clashes'
    NATO Should Invite Macedonia, Montenegro to Join Bloc – Warsaw
    EU, NATO Fail to Counter Existing Security Challenges - Czech FM
    NATO Troops Simulate Combat 200 Km From Russia
    Tags:
    NATO, ballistic missile, INF treaty, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik