15:11 GMT16 January 2021
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    NATO Seeks Expansion to Eastern Europe (362)
    0 53

    A coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space stated that the NATO's decision to to establish the rapid-force unit shows its intention to provoke Russia.

    WASHINGTON, December 4 (Sputnik) — NATO’s newly approved rapid-reaction force is a provocative measure that could prompt a war with Russia, coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space Bruce Gagnon, told Sputnik on Thursday.

    Американские, латвийские, литовские и британские военные во время совместных учений
    Ministry of Defence of Latvia / Gatis Diezins
    “It [the decision to establish the rapid-force unit] indicates US-NATO is saying to Russia – either surrender to full western corporate control of your economy, or we will go to war with you and take you down,” Gagnon said. “Such decisions only worsen the situation and could serve as the trigger for war, even possibly nuclear war.”

    NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg recently announced the alliance’s plan to have an interim rapid-reaction force in place by 2015 to deal with the security challenges in Europe and elsewhere. A full-scale unit is expected to be established by 2016.

    The expert noted that with the establishment of this new unit, the NATO military alliance will have permanently stationed military forces right on Russia’s border.

    “For Russia the disadvantage is they will have to spend even more money on their defensive military capabilities and be in a constant state of readiness,” he added.

    Referring to US foreign policy as reminiscent of the Cold War in the 1950’s, Gagnon said that the ultimate US-NATO goal was to balkanize Russia like has been done to Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya and most recently to Syria.

    Gagnon was also of the opinion that NATO wants control of resource extraction in the Arctic region, of which Russia has the largest land border along.

    “So the plan appears to be to militarily encircle it [Arctic border] in order to try to give western oil corporations full control of that part of the planet. “Other countries like Canada, Norway and Sweden are being brought into this Arctic militarization program as well,” Gagnon explained.

    Meanwhile, John Quigley, Emeritus Professor at the Ohio State University told Sputnik on Thursday that NATO should reassess its position in regards to Russia by firstly taking into account the right of self-determination for the population of Crimea.

    “NATO should engage in a serious re-evaluation of its position on Crimea,” Quigley said.

    Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Wednesday that NATO is not ready to develop equality-based cooperation with Moscow in countering real security threats in the Euro-Atlantic region.

    Relations between Russia and NATO have deteriorated amid the Ukrainian crisis, as the alliance has accused Moscow of interfering in Ukraine’s internal affairs. Russia has repeatedly denied the claims.

    Following the reunification of Crimea with Russia in March, NATO boosted its military presence in Poland and in the former Soviet Baltic republics of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, suspending all practical cooperation with Russia.

    Russia has repeatedly expressed concern over the bloc’s expansion in Eastern Europe and the current increase in its military presence close to Russian borders. In late September, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called NATO expansion a "mistake" and a "provocation" that undermines the entire European security system.

    The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

    NATO Seeks Expansion to Eastern Europe (362)


    Lethal Aid Supplies Issue for Bilateral Talks With NATO Members: Ambassador
    NATO Vows to Continue Military Presence Near Eastern Borders
    NATO Chief Accuses Russia of Replacing Rule of Law With Law of Force
    Stoltenberg: NATO Supports Kiev's Efforts to Implement Minsk Agreements
    NATO, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion