Labour Backbencher Tables 'Wealth Tax' Amendment to Social Care Vote

© JESSICA TAYLORBritain's PM Johnson addresses lawmakers about Afghanistan
Britain's PM Johnson addresses lawmakers about Afghanistan - Sputnik International, 1920, 08.09.2021
Subscribe
International
India
The government's plan will provide funding for social care costs over £86,000 over a lifetime — arguably of small benefit to those living outside big cities and the south of England, with little savings and home values well below the national average of around £250,000.
A left-wing Labour Party backbench MP is leading a bid to see the Tory government's elderly care plan funded by a "wealth tax" on the "super-rich".
Leeds East MP Richard Burgon tweeted on Thursday that he tabled an amendment to the Conservative plan to raise the National Insurance (NI) rate — the UK's social security tax — by 1.25 percent to pay for pensioners' social care costs and clearing the National Health Service (NHS) backlog.

The amendment Burgon and 16 other left-wingers proposes is an undefined tax on "those with assets over £5 million" to pay for the promised scheme, claiming that the NI rise was "hitting working people".

The text of the amendment is somewhat weaker, however, stipulating only that Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak must make an "assessment" of the wealth tax idea before going ahead with the NI hike.

"The chancellor of the exchequer must lay before the House of Commons an assessment of the impact of raising at least the same amount of revenue as would be raised by the tax... by introducing a wealth tax on individuals with assets totalling over £5,000,000", it reads, without specifying how such a tax should be collected.

Another amendment tabled by Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer makes the tax hike conditional on the chancellor providing "an assessment of the impact of these measures on jobs and businesses, and... a distributional impact assessment of these measures on different income groups and regions" — but without any criteria to block it once that report is delivered.
On Wednesday, Starmer also claimed that raising the NI was "hitting young and low-paid workers while leaving the wealthy untouched" — failing to mention that employers pay more in NI contributions than employees, who are not charged on the first £9,560 they earn — or acknowledging that the tax increase will also be levied on private pensions and share dividends.
Britain's PM, Health Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer visit Westport Care Home in London - Sputnik International, 1920, 07.09.2021
Social Care Tax Hike: Price of a Pint a Week to Inherit Mum and Dad's House?
Former Labour Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Leicester East MP Claudia Webbe, both co-sponsors of Burgon's amendment, also appeared not to know how the tax was levied.
Labour peer and former Transport Secretary Lord Adonis, normally a knee-jerk opponent of Prime Minister Boris Johnson's pro-Brexit government, warned the party against opposing the policy without providing a concrete alternative.
By contrast, the Green Party has proposed to abolish the social security tax and put the whole burden on income tax — eliminating employers' NI contributions of 13.8 percent of salaries over £8,850 per year with no upper cap.
The government's proposal would pay for individuals' social care costs over a threshold of £86,000 over their lifetime — partially addressing the issue of pensioners being forced to spend their life savings and equity on their home on expensive care, leaving nothing for their children to inherit.
But the cap could mean little benefit to the majority of people outside the big cities and the south of England, in areas where house prices are well below the national average of around £250,000.
Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала