German Media Suggests Afghanistan ‘Disaster’ Demonstrates Impotence of Europe’s Militaries
15:46 GMT 28.08.2021 (Updated: 17:24 GMT 28.08.2021)
© RIA Novosti . Andrei GreshnovGerman troops operating in Afghanistan
© RIA Novosti . Andrei Greshnov
The US and NATO-backed government in Kabul collapsed on 15 August, four months after Washington announced unilaterally that all its troops would be out of Afghanistan by the fall. These events sparked an existential crisis within the Western alliance, and led to questions about whether the US gives any weight to its European allies’ concerns.
The dramatic events in Afghanistan this month and Europe’s inability to act without Washington’s support is a sign of the continent’s military impotence and utter dependence on the United States for defence, Suddeutsche Zeitung contributor Daniel Brossler has suggested.
In an op-ed for the newspaper published on Friday, the journalist suggested that “the disaster in Afghanistan” has demonstrated that although “Europe is capable of many things,” the ability to pursue its own defence policy is not one of them.
The ongoing chaotic evacuation of Kabul Airport a perfect example, according to Brossler. “The overwhelming power of the Western alliance has always stood in remarkable contrast to the impotence of its highest civilian representative. A NATO secretary general has to show consideration for all members of the alliance, but above all has to listen to one member: the USA...At the disastrous end to the alliance’s mission in Afghanistan,” NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg “would have liked to see the airport in Kabul remain open for a few more days, but his wish was irrelevant,” he wrote.
The contributor suggested that in the aftermath of Thursday’s attacks on the Kabul airport, which killed 13 US troops and scores of Afghans, “none” of NATO’s allies “would have been willing or able to continue” operating on the ground in the country for “even a minute longer without the US.”
“It was therefore clear from the start that the Germans, British, or French would be completely dependent on the Americans to rescue their people and that [the European countries’] wishes would be of secondary importance. This was a painful and brutal, but not a new experience.”
The entire Afghanistan mission, Brossler recalled, relied on the US, which pulled the alliance into the war following the 9/11 terror attacks and the subsequent US invasion of the West Asian nation in late 2001.
The Afghan mission “has always depended on the willingness of the Americans to invest considerable military and financial resources. However, the past few weeks have shown to Europeans how little consideration even a man like [Joe] Biden has for them,” the journalist argued.
Brossler suggested that the US retreat from Europe began under Barack Obama, and would not end with Biden. “The rivalry with China and America’s deep reluctance to continue to wear itself out in the thankless job of world policeman will remain the key factor. This new reality has already changed the world considerably. What has remained the same in many ways is NATO.”
The journalist stressed that unfortunately, recent increases in European defence budgets, and efforts by officials including German Chancellor Angela Merkel asking the continent’s leaders to "take their fate into their own hands" as far as defence is concerned appear to have had little impact on the US-European power dynamic. “The fact remains that the USA alone spends significantly more than twice as much on the military than all other NATO allies combined. Little has changed in the imbalance of military capabilities.”
And while “this imbalance was not a serious problem so long as NATO was seen as equally useful on both sides of that Atlantic,” today, according to Brossler, the situation has shifted, with the “shameful end to the Afghanistan mission” serving as a “turning point” and bringing to an end any desire for any more nation-building operations abroad, at least for the foreseeable future, by the alliance.
“Europe is at the mercy of foreign powers in a variety of ways. The attempt to build a state [in Afghanistan], which failed so dramatically, will remain in the bones of those in power for a long time to come. Nevertheless, they too will now have to protect Europe from terrorist threats in the immediate vicinity. This is happening today and will continue to take place increasingly without the Americans,” the journalist noted.
Brossler believes that Europe will now need to start reducing the imbalances which were built into the Western alliance from its beginning. “The greatest danger for Europeans,” he warns, “is not that the US will ask too much of them, but rather that at some point they will no longer be asked.”
The unexpectedly rapid collapse of the Afghan government, and Washington’s insistence on withdrawing no matter the cost to the alliance’s image, has sparked concerns among officials in some NATO countries about the future of the transatlantic partnership.
Earlier this month, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Chancellor Merkel and NATO’s Stoltenberg admitted that no alliance member would be able to fill the US’s shoes after Washington made the firm decision to withdraw from the country.
German Mission in Afghanistan Reaches Its End
During its 19+ year deployment in Afghanistan, Germany lost 59 troops and three policemen, with nearly 250 soldiers and police injured during the same period. Over 150,000 Bundeswehr troops have been deployed in Afghanistan, with their deployment constituting the largest German deployment abroad since the Second World War.