- Sputnik International
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

US Secretly Taped Alleged 9/11 Architect Plotting With Co-Conspirators - Reports

© AP Photo / Marty LederhandlerIn this Sept. 11, 2001, file photo, the twin towers of the World Trade Center burn behind the Empire State Building in New York.
In this Sept. 11, 2001, file photo, the twin towers of the World Trade Center burn behind the Empire State Building in New York. - Sputnik International
More than 17 and a half years after the deadly 9/11 attacks, the five accused terrorists remain in jail and there is still no date for trial proceedings at a US prison in Guanatanamo Bay.

Defence lawyer Jay Connell said on Monday that military prosecutors claimed they had tapes of phone calls between the alleged architect of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and three of his accused accomplices discussing their plot in code months before it took place, The New York Times reported.

READ MORE: Encryption Key for Legal Firm Emails in Hacked 9/11 Files Reportedly Released

Connell revealed the information in order to show opposition to plans to use the alleged tapes as evidence at the death penalty trial of the suspected perpetrators.

Security forces are seen at the scene of a blast in Nairobi, Tuesday, Jan. 15, 2019 - Sputnik International
US Citizen Killed in Kenya Hotel Terror Attack Was 9/11 Survivor - Reports
According to the media outlet, citing the attorney, prosecutors provided defence lawyers with the audio and transcripts of their translation on 30 September 2016, and signalled their intention to use them at trial.

While investigating their origins, defence lawyers reportedly found out that the original trial judge, Army Col. James L. Pohl, had issued a secret order preventing them from learning about a system that permitted the collection of phone calls or asking questions about it.

Connell, who is currently representing Mohammed’s nephew, Ammar al-Baluchi, claimed that prosecutors had secretly obtained a ruling in August 2018 from Colonel Pohl banning defence lawyers from finding out how the calls had been collected or looking into that matter. According to the NYT, the phone calls in at least two languages were made between April and October 2001.

READ MORE: US Slammed by 9/11 Victim's Wife for Prioritising Ties With Saudis Over Justice

Connell argued that such a restriction violated the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, meaning that it breached a defendant's right to challenge the evidence used against him in a trial, and contended in court on Monday that either the tapes should be suppressed or the case should be dismissed.

While the military trial judges have yet to decide which aspects of the Constitution apply in military commissions — the war court set up by President George W. Bush after the 9/11 events — prosecutor Clayton Trivett responded by saying that defence lawyers would be allowed to question an FBI linguist who compared samples of the voices of the accused to the voices on the tapes to confirm they were Mohammed, al-Baluchi, and two other suspected co-conspirators.

9/11 Terror Attacks: World Trade Center - Sputnik International
Cybersecurity Expert on Dark Overlord's 9/11 Data: It Might Paint Bigger Picture
They will also be allowed to question an FBI analyst who decoded the phone calls, but the only restriction, Trivett said, is on lawyers attempting to investigate "how the United States government got those calls", something, prosecutors told the judge, would jeopardise national security.

In the meantime, Colonel Pohl said that prosecutors could say that the evidence had been obtained from "telephone calls from between April and October 2001 that were later determined to pertain to the planned attacks on Sept. 11, 2001", the NYT reported.

Trivett refused to reveal how and when the FBI acquired voice samples of the alleged attackers, but said that they were not from the CIA black sites where the five accused plotters were held before being transferred to Guantanamo for trial in 2006.

This week, a new military judge, Col. Keith Parrella of the Marines, is set to hear attorneys and prosecutors argue in the 34th round of pre-trial hearings since the five defendants were arraigned in 2012.

READ MORE: US Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Make 9/11 Victim Fund Permanent

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a Pakistani Islamist militant who allegedly boasted in 2007 that he "was responsible for the 9/11 operation — A to Z", is accused of first proposing to carry out attacks on the United States to then al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in 1996.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shields her eyes as she takes her seat to talk with Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, during The Atlantic Festival, Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018, in Washington. - Sputnik International
Twitter in Disgust as Clinton Compares Russia's Alleged Meddling to 9/11 Attacks
His suspected co-conspirators held at Guantanamo include Walid bin Attash, a Yemeni, who purportedly ran an al-Qaeda training base in Afghanistan where two of the 19 airplane hijackers were trained; Ramzi bin al-Shibh, another Yemeni national, who is accused of helping a German cell of hijackers find flight schools and enter the US; Ammar al-Baluchi, a Kuwaiti and Mohammed's nephew, who is accused of transferring about $120,000 to the hijackers to cover their expenses and flight training; and Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, a Saudi, who is suspected of having sent money, western clothing, traveller's cheques and credit cards to some of the hijackers.

On 11 September 2001, al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked airplanes to bring down the twin towers of New York City’s World Trade Centre and attack the Pentagon, and a Pennsylvania field. The worst attack in the history of the United States claimed the lives of some 3,000 people.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала